Literature DB >> 22641143

Successful inhibitory control over an immediate reward is associated with attentional disengagement in visual processing areas.

David A O'Connor1, Sarah Rossiter, Murat Yücel, Dan I Lubman, Robert Hester.   

Abstract

We examined the neural basis of the capacity to resist an immediately rewarding stimulus in order to obtain a larger delayed reward. This was investigated with a Go/No-go task employing No-go targets that provided two types of reward outcomes. These were contingent on inhibitory control performance: failure to inhibit Reward No-go targets provided a small monetary reward with immediate feedback; while successful inhibitory control resulted in larger rewards with delayed feedback based on the highest number of consecutive inhibitions. We observed faster Go trial responses with maintained levels of inhibition accuracy during the Reward No-go condition compared to a neutral No-go condition. Comparisons between conditions of BOLD activity showed successful inhibitory control over rewarding No-Go targets was associated with hypoactivity in regions previously associated with regulating emotion and inhibitory control, including insula and right inferior frontal gyrus. In addition, regions previously associated with visual processing centers that are modulated as a function of visual attention, namely the left fusiform and right superior temporal gyri, were hypoactive. These findings suggest a role for attentional disengagement as an aid to withholding response over a rewarding stimulus and are consistent with the notion that gratification can be delayed by directing attention away from immediate rewards. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22641143     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Neural activation during response inhibition differentiates blast from mechanical causes of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Barbara L Fischer; Michael Parsons; Sally Durgerian; Christine Reece; Lyla Mourany; Mark J Lowe; Erik B Beall; Katherine A Koenig; Stephen E Jones; Mary R Newsome; Randall S Scheibel; Elisabeth A Wilde; Maya Troyanskaya; Tricia L Merkley; Mark Walker; Harvey S Levin; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Brain reward region responsivity of adolescents with and without parental substance use disorders.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Yokum
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2013-10-14

3.  Distinct neural circuits support incentivized inhibition.

Authors:  Josiah K Leong; Kelly H MacNiven; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Resting-state functional connectivity of the human hypothalamus.

Authors:  Stephanie Kullmann; Martin Heni; Katarzyna Linder; Stephan Zipfel; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Ralf Veit; Andreas Fritsche; Hubert Preissl
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Examining the link between reward and response inhibition in individuals with substance abuse tendencies.

Authors:  Kaileigh A Byrne; Darrell A Worthy
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  A pilot study linking reduced fronto-Striatal recruitment during reward processing to persistent bingeing following treatment for binge-eating disorder.

Authors:  Iris M Balodis; Carlos M Grilo; Hedy Kober; Patrick D Worhunsky; Marney A White; Michael C Stevens; Godfrey D Pearlson; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.861

7.  Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention.

Authors:  Zachary D Langford; Hanne Schevernels; C Nico Boehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Striatal responsiveness to reward under threat-of-shock and working memory load: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Claudie Gaillard; Matthias Guillod; Monique Ernst; Salvatore Torrisi; Andrea Federspiel; Dominik Schoebi; Romina E Recabarren; Xinyi Ouyang; Christoph Mueller-Pfeiffer; Antje Horsch; Philipp Homan; Roland Wiest; Gregor Hasler; Chantal Martin-Soelch
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Effects of incentives, age, and behavior on brain activation during inhibitory control: a longitudinal fMRI study.

Authors:  David J Paulsen; Michael N Hallquist; Charles F Geier; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.464

10.  Attention Diversion Improves Response Inhibition of Immediate Reward, But Only When it Is Beneficial: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  Franco Scalzo; David A O'Connor; Catherine Orr; Kevin Murphy; Robert Hester
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.