Literature DB >> 22640691

Prevalence of ventricular conduction blocks in the resting electrocardiogram in a general population: the Health 2000 Survey.

Petri Haataja1, Kjell Nikus, Mika Kähönen, Heini Huhtala, Tuomo Nieminen, Antti Jula, Antti Reunanen, Veikko Salomaa, Samuel Sclarovsky, Markku S Nieminen, Markku Eskola.   

Abstract

AIMS: The prevalence of eight different ventricular conduction blocks and their association with risk factors and major cardiovascular diseases were studied in a major Finnish population study.
METHODS: Data, including 12-lead electrocardiograms, were collected from 6315 subjects. The prevalence of left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), non-specific ventricular block, incomplete LBBB, incomplete RBBB, R-R'-pattern, left anterior hemiblock (LAHB), and left posterior hemiblock (LPHB) was calculated for both genders in three age groups. Their association with risk factors and cardiovascular diseases was studied.
RESULTS: R-R'-pattern was the most common ventricular conduction block in all age groups (3.9%, p<0.001 for comparison between groups), but it showed no association with cardiovascular diseases. Males had more RBBB (1.5% vs. 0.7%, p<0.001), incomplete LBBB (1.8 vs. 0.4, p<0.001) and non-specific ventricular block (1.1% vs. 0.1%, p<0.001). With increasing age (<45 years vs. >55 years) LBBB, RBBB and LAHB (0 vs. 2.2%, 0.3 vs. 2.2%, 0.2 vs. 1.9% respectively, p-values<0.001) became more prevalent. LBBB, RBBB and non-specific ventricular conduction block were associated with coronary heart disease (angina pectoris in 28.3, 20.3 and 22.9%, respectively) and heart failure (25.0, 10.1 and 11.4%, respectively). LBBB and RBBB were also associated with peripheral vascular disease (8.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular conduction blocks differ in prevalence between sexes and age groups. They also show disparate association with cardiovascular diseases. These differences need to be taken into consideration in everyday clinical practice.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General population; Incidence; Ventricular conduction blocks

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22640691     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  19 in total

1.  Prevalence of Intraventricular Conduction Disturbances in a Large French Population.

Authors:  Jonathan Monin; Sébastien Bisconte; Aurore Nicaise; Anne-Pia Hornez; Olivier Manen; Eric Perrier
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Right ventricular electrical and mechanical synchronization by properly timed septal pacing in a patient with right bundle branch block and first degree AV block--a case report.

Authors:  Calin Siliste; Maria-Claudia-Berenice Suran; Andrei-Dumitru Margulescu; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Ventricular conduction defects and the risk of incident heart failure in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Authors:  Zhu-Ming Zhang; Pentti M Rautaharju; Ronald J Prineas; Laura Loehr; Wayne Rosamond; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.712

4.  Usefulness of electrocardiographic QRS/T angles with versus without bundle branch blocks to predict heart failure (from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study).

Authors:  Zhu-ming Zhang; Pentti M Rautaharju; Ronald J Prineas; Laura Loehr; Wayne Rosamond; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Incidence of arrhythmias and impact of permanent pacemaker implantation in hospitalizations with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Rajkumar Doshi; Dean H Decter; Perwaiz Meraj
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Familial Clustering of Cardiac Conduction Defects and Pacemaker Insertion.

Authors:  Bernhard M Kaess; Charlotte Andersson; Meredith S Duncan; Martin G Larson; Kristian Aasbjerg; Gunnar H Gislason; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-06-20

7.  A wide QRS/T angle in bundle branch blocks is associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Authors:  Zhu-Ming Zhang; Pentti M Rautaharju; Ronald J Prineas; Eric A Whitsel; Larisa Tereshchenko; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.438

8.  Cardiac conduction disturbances in rheumatologic disease: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Louis Gerges; Kyla D'Angelo; David Bass; Arezoo Haghshenas; Daniel J Kersten; Manmeet Ahluwalia; Roman Zelster; Amgad N Makaryus
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-02-15

9.  A community-based study on electrocardiographic abnormalities of adult population from South India - Findings from a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Mangalath Narayanan Krishnan; Zachariah Geevar; Krishnan Nair Venugopal; Padinhare Purayil Mohanan; Sivadasanpillai Harikrishnan; Ganapathi Sanjay; Shanmugasundaram Devika; Kavumpurathu Raman Thankappan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2022-05-13

10.  Different patterns of bundle-branch blocks and the risk of incident heart failure in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study.

Authors:  Zhu-ming Zhang; Pentti M Rautaharju; Elsayed Z Soliman; Joann E Manson; Lisa W Martin; Marco Perez; Mara Vitolins; Ronald J Prineas
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 8.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.