Literature DB >> 22640560

Exam-indicated cerclage in patients with fetal membranes at or beyond external os: a retrospective evaluation.

Alessandra Curti1, Giuliana Simonazzi, Antonio Farina, Hilda Mehmeti, Fabio Facchinetti, Nicola Rizzo.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate pregnancy outcome in women with fetal membranes at or beyond external os who underwent exam-indicated cerclage or conservative management.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 52 patients with fetal membranes at or beyond external os between 17 and 27 weeks of gestation, treated in two third-level hospitals, between January 2001 and April 2009. The outcomes of interest of the study, prolongation of pregnancy and neonatal survival rate, were stratified according to type of management, parity, clinical conditions and blood tests at admission and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier algorithm.
RESULTS: Of 52 women, 37 received exam-indicated cerclage and 15 were managed conservatively. The rate of patients still pregnant beyond 180 days within the cerclage group differed significantly from those of the conservative management group (80% vs 0%, respectively) (P-value<0.001). No difference has been found according to neonatal survival (82% versus 53%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Exam-indicated cerclage appears to prolong gestation compared to expectant management.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2012 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22640560     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01882.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  3 in total

1.  Is Uterocervical Angle Associated with Gestational Latency after Physical Exam Indicated Cerclage?

Authors:  Kate Swanson; William A Grobman; Emily S Miller
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis.

Authors:  Max Mönckeberg; Rafael Valdés; Juan P Kusanovic; Manuel Schepeler; Jyh K Nien; Emiliano Pertossi; Pablo Silva; Karla Silva; Pía Venegas; Ulises Guajardo; Roberto Romero; Sebastián E Illanes
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.716

3.  A Three-Step Procedure for Emergency Cerclage: Gestational and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Manuel Gómez-Castellano; Lorena Sabonet-Morente; Ernesto González-Mesa; Jesús S Jiménez-López
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.