Literature DB >> 2263975

Compressive strength of autologous and allogenous bone grafts for thoracolumbar and cervical spine fusion.

R H Wittenberg1, J Moeller, M Shea, A A White, W C Hayes.   

Abstract

The selection of the bone graft type for stabilization of spinal fusion depends on availability, the clinical situation, and the desired mechanical stability. The authors determined the potential immediate postoperative compressive strength of various types of bone grafts under axial compression on a material testing machine. The fibular strut graft (5,070 +/- 3,250 N, mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) was significantly stronger (P less than 0.05) than the anterior (1,150 +/- 487 N) and posterior (667 +/- 311 N) iliac crest grafts, and the rib grafts (452 +/- 192 N). Hydroxyapatite grafts with a pore size of 200 mu were significantly stronger (P less than 0.05) than those with a pore size of 500 mu (1,420 +/- 480 N versus 338 +/- 78 N). Ethylenoxide sterilization had no significant effect on the immediate compressive strength. Bicortical and tricortical Bailey-Badgley and Cloward bone grafts also were compared. Results showed that all cervical graft types may be sufficiently strong to support sizable loads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2263975     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199015100-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery].

Authors:  F Kandziora; K J Schnake; C K Klostermann; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Value of polydirectional tomography in the assessment of the postoperative spine after anterior decompression and vertebral body autografting.

Authors:  D Karasick; E A Huettl; J M Cotler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony Minh Tien Chau; Lileane Liang Xu; Johnny Ho-Yin Wong; Ralph Jasper Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  OPF/PMMA cage system as an alternative approach for the treatment of vertebral corpectomy.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Alan L Miller; Xifeng Liu; Benjamin D Elder; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Appl Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.679

Review 5.  Anterior cervical spine fusion: struts, plugs, and plates.

Authors:  D Karasick
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  A New Vertebral Body Replacement Strategy Using Expandable Polymeric Cages.

Authors:  Xifeng Liu; Alex Paulsen; Hugo Giambini; Ji Guo; A Lee Miller; Po-Chun Lin; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Relevance of expandable titanium cage for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Fahed Zaïri; Rabih Aboukais; Laurent Thines; Mohamed Allaoui; Richard Assaker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Vascularised fibula osteocutaneous flap for cervical spinal and posterior pharyngeal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Krishnakumar Thankappan; Sandip Duarah; Nirav P Trivedi; Dilip Panikar; Moni Abraham Kuriakose; Subramania Iyer
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009-07

9.  Iliac crest versus artificial bone grafts in 250 cervical fusions.

Authors:  S Savolainen; J P Usenius; J Hernesniemi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 10.  Bone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Anthony M T Chau; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.