| Literature DB >> 22639588 |
Abstract
Global change can greatly affect plant populations both directly by influencing growing conditions and indirectly by maternal effects on development of offspring. More information is needed on transgenerational effects of global change on plants and their interactions with pathogens. The current study assessed potential maternal effects of atmospheric CO(2) enrichment on performance and disease susceptibility of first-generation offspring of the Mediterranean legume Onobrychis crista-galli. Mother plants were grown at three CO(2) concentrations, and the study focused on their offspring that were raised under common ambient climate and CO(2). In addition, progeny were exposed to natural infection by the fungal pathogen powdery mildew. In one out of 3 years, offspring of high-CO(2) treatments (440 and 600 ppm) had lower shoot biomass and reproductive output than offspring of low-CO(2) treatment (280 ppm). Disease severity in a heavy-infection year was higher in high-CO(2) than in low-CO(2) offspring. However, some of the findings on maternal effects changed when the population was divided into two functionally diverging plant types distinguishable by flower color (pink, Type P; white, Type W). Disease severity in a heavy-infection year was higher in high-CO(2) than in low-CO(2) progeny in the more disease-resistant (Type P), but not in the more susceptible plant type (Type W). In a low-infection year, maternal CO(2) treatments did not differ in disease severity. Mother plants of Type P exposed to low CO(2) produced larger seeds than all other combinations of CO(2) and plant type, which might contribute to higher offspring performance. This study showed that elevated CO(2) potentially exerts environmental maternal effects on performance of progeny and, notably, also on their susceptibility to natural infection by a pathogen. Maternal effects of global change might differently affect functionally divergent plant types, which could impact population fitness and alter plant communities.Entities:
Keywords: Onobrychis crista-galli; atmospheric CO2 enrichment; biomass production; environmental maternal effects; fungal pathogen; natural population; plant disease; plant type
Year: 2011 PMID: 22639588 PMCID: PMC3355632 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1.
Fraction of plant types randomly allocated to maternal CO.
| Maternal CO2 (ppm) | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type P | Type W | Type P | Type W | Type P | Type W | |
| 280 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.32 | 0.67 | 0.33 |
| 440 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.36 | 0.64 | 0.35 | 0.65 |
| 600 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.62 |
Figure 2Disease progress as affected by maternal CO. Inserts show disease-progress affected by maternal CO2 only (Case 1). Disease severity was determined for each leaf and was subsequently added up for all leaves of a plant and expressed on a scale ranging between 0 and 1 (see Materials and Methods). Mean ± 1 SE, n = 3 model ecosystems. Non-identical letters indicate statistically significant differences among combinations of maternal CO2 treatments and plant type (main panels) or among maternal CO2 concentrations (inserts) as analyzed by the Tukey–Kramer HSD test (P ≤ 0.05 within mixed models, see Table 4). Sixty-three days after sowing in 2007, disease severity was significantly higher in 440-ppm progenies of plant-type W compared with all Type P progenies (Tukey–Kramer HSD test, P ≤ 0.05).
Probability (.
| Year | Variable | Time (days after sowing) | Case 1 | Case 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal CO2 | Maternal CO2 | Plant type | Maternal CO2 × Plant type | |||
| 2005 | Disease severity | 76 | 0.606z | 0.780 | 0.759 | |
| 2006 | Disease onset | 0.560 | 0.897 | 0.714 | ||
| Disease severity | 59 | 0.220 | 0.304 | |||
| 69 | 0.328 | |||||
| AUDPC | 0.411 | |||||
| 2007 | Disease severity | 55 | 0.631 | |||
| 63 | 0.413 | 0.755 | ||||
| 69 | 0.365 | 0.621 | 0.147 | |||
| 76 | 0.514 | |||||
| AUDPC | 0.457 | 0.894 | 0.201 |
Mixed models consisted of one-way ANOVA (Case 1) or two-way ANOVA (Case 2), and only fixed effects are presented (for random effects, see ≤ 0.05 were indicated in bold digits, P values ≤ 0.1 and > 0.05 were underlined. Empty fields and missing time points represent variables which failed to meet the assumptions of ANOVA. < 0.001. In the latter case, disease severity was significantly higher for high-CO≤ 0.05).
Seed size in mother plants and offspring performance for the common scenario of Case 1 where plant types are indistinguishable and for Case 2 with distinct plant types.
| Variable | Exp. Year | Case 1 (disregarding plant types) | Case 2 (distinguishing between plant types) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant-type P | Plant-type W | |||||||||
| 280 ppm | 440 ppm | 600 ppm | 280 ppm | 440 ppm | 600 ppm | 280 ppm | 440 ppm | 600 ppm | ||
| Seed size (mg) | Pre-exp. | 11.1 (0.8) | 9.4 (0.5) | 9.5 (0.3) | 12.0 (0.9)a | 10.1 (0.6)b | 9.6 (0.4)b | 9.6 (0.9)b | 8.9 (0.4)b | 9.5 (0.6)b |
| Seedling emergence (days after sowing) | 2006 | 5.9 (0.2) | 5.9 (0.1) | 6.3 (0.6) | 5.8 (0.3) | 5.7 (0.4) | 5.3 (0.2) | 6.5 (0.2) | 6.5 (0.6) | 6.8 (0.8) |
| 2007 | 10.3 (0.7) | 11.5 (0.3) | 10.8 (0.9) | 9.5 (0.7) | 11.0 (1.0) | 10.0 (0.7) | 12.3 (1.3) | 11.7 (0.4) | 11.3 (0.9) | |
| Anthesis (days after sowing) | 2006 | 71.0 (1.4) | 73.2 (1.9) | 73.1 (0.7) | 68.9 (0.6) | 70.1 (2.6) | 71.3 (1.4) | 72.8 (2.9) | 75.1 (1.0) | 74.2 (0.6) |
| 2007 | 74.0 (0.8) | 74.2 (1.4) | 74.0 (0.3) | 73.0 (1.6) | 73.8 (1.4) | 73.1 (0.6) | 75.1 (0.3) | 74.4 (1.4) | 74.2 (0.5) | |
| Shoot biomass (mg per individual) | 2005 | 676 (49)a | 554 (6)b | 564 (8)b | 756 (40) | 644 (39) | 664 (62) | 585 (87) | 484 (26) | 484 (11) |
| 2006 | 338 (17) | 318 (46) | 311 (22) | 384 (6) | 403 (41) | 391 (28) | 241 (32) | 269 (25) | 243 (23) | |
| Number of fruits per individual plant | 2005 | 3.94 (0.22)a | 3.35 (0.13)b | 3.33 (0.05)ab | 4.50 (0.29) | 3.28 (0.15) | 2.92 (0.46) | 3.44 (0.29) | 3.40 (0.10) | 3.67 (0.44) |
| 2006 | 1.71 (0.12) | 1.56 (0.24) | 1.68 (0.16) | 1.90 (0.10) | 2.04 (0.27) | 2.02 (0.23) | 1.49 (0.15) | 1.13 (0.09) | 1.34 (0.05) | |
| 2007 | 3.89 (0.32) | 3.98 (0.30) | 4.08 (0.04) | 3.53 (0.11) | 3.92 (0.36) | 3.72 (0.17) | 4.67 (0.88) | 4.02 (0.27) | 4.43 (0.20) | |
| Number of seeds per individual plant | 2006 | 4.71 (0.26) | 4.28 (0.70) | 4.15 (0.42) | 5.40 (0.28) | 5.92 (0.71) | 5.42 (0.34) | 3.69 (0.54) | 2.94 (0.14) | 2.99 (0.31) |
| 2007 | 9.07 (0.69) | 9.03 (0.56) | 9.40 (0.23) | 8.89 (0.46) | 10.58 (1.18) | 9.80 (0.61) | 9.42 (1.21) | 8.24 (0.26) | 9.60 (0.70) | |
| Seed size (mg) | 2007 | 14.8 (0.3) | 13.8 (0.7) | 14.7 (0.5) | 16.2 (0.6) | 15.1 (0.7) | 17.0 (0.4) | 12.4 (0.5) | 13.1 (0.9) | 13.2 (0.3) |
Data presented are mean ± 1 SE of n = 3 model ecosystems. Non-identical letters (a, b) designate statistically significant differences (P = 0.05, Tukey–Kramer HSD) among maternal CO.
Probability (.
| Variable | Exp. year | Case 1 | Case 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal CO2 | Maternal CO2 | Plant type | Maternal CO2 × Plant type | ||
| Seed size | Pre-exp. | 0.131 | 0.282 | ||
| Seedling emergence | 2006 | 0.880 | 0.698 | 0.696 | |
| 2007 | 0.159 | 0.353 | 0.242 | ||
| Anthesis | 2006 | 0.499 | 0.562 | 0.796 | |
| 2007 | 0.988 | 0.935 | 0.149 | 0.809 | |
| Shoot biomass | 2005 | 0.146 | 0.992 | ||
| 2006 | 0.810 | 0.662 | 0.948 | ||
| Number of fruits per individual plant | 2005 | 0.839 | 0.182 | ||
| 2006 | 0.815 | 0.780 | 0.422 | ||
| 2007 | 0.869 | 0.965 | 0.484 | ||
| Number of seeds per individual plant Seed size | 2006 | 0.691 | 0.646 | 0.467 | |
| 2007 | 0.867 | 0.845 | 0.309 | 0.221 | |
| 2007 | 0.487 | 0.439 | 0.224 | ||
Mixed models consisted of one-way ANOVA (Case 1) or two-way ANOVA (Case 2), and only fixed effects were presented (for random effects, see ≤ 0.05 were indicated in bold digits, P values ≤ 0.1 and > 0.05 were underlined.
Figure 3Area under disease-progress curve (AUDPC) as affected by maternal CO. AUDPC was calculated according to Eq. 1. Mean ± 1 SE, n = 3 model ecosystems. Non-identical letters indicate statistically significant differences among maternal CO2 concentrations (left panels) or combinations of maternal CO2 treatments and plant type (right panels) as analyzed by the Tukey–Kramer HSD test (P ≤ 0.05 within mixed models, see Table 4).