Literature DB >> 22639375

"How I do it"--radical right colectomy with side-to-side stapled ileo-colonic anastomosis.

M Hübner1, D W Larson, B G Wolff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Standardization of surgical technique helps to reproduce excellent clinical outcomes, especially in teaching institutions. We aim to describe in detail our established approach for oncological right colectomy. TECHNIQUE: The right colon is mobilized in a five-step latero-inferior approach starting off with the terminal ileum, visualizing the duodenum and the head of pancreas. The ascending colon is dissected from the retroperitoneum, and takedown of the hepatic flexure is completed coming retrograde from the transverse colon. Transection of the remaining retroperitoneal attachments completes exposure of the duodenum and mobilization of the right colon. Ileocolic vessels are dissected out and divided close to their origin, and the mesocolon is divided. We then establish intestinal continuity by use of a side-to-side stapled technique. The arms of a linear cutting stapler are inserted via transverse incisions at the anti-mesenteric sides of the terminal ileum and the transverse colon (tenia) and fired. The enterotomy site is closed by removal of the specimen using a second transverse firing of the linear cutting stapler. An important final step is the reinforcement of the anastomotic ends and the crossing of the staple lines; an omental patch and closure of the mesenteric window are optional.
CONCLUSION: The suggested standardized five-step lateral-to-medial dissection of the right colon and the three-step side-to-side stapled technique for ileo-colonic anastomosis are easy to learn and to reproduce. Careful adherence to pivotal technical details will help to obtain an optimal oncological outcome and a consistently low leak rate around 2%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22639375     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1909-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  A fast-track recovery protocol improves outcomes in elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis.

Authors:  David W Larson; Niles J Batdorf; John G Touzios; Robert R Cima; Heidi K Chua; John H Pemberton; Eric J Dozois
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery.

Authors:  Sven Muller; Marco P Zalunardo; Martin Hubner; Pierre A Clavien; Nicolas Demartines
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Advantages of fast-track recovery after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Vassiliki L Tsikitis; Stefan D Holubar; Eric J Dozois; Robert R Cima; John H Pemberton; David W Larson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  The use of staplers in anatomical side-to-side and functional end-to-end enteroanastomoses.

Authors:  F M Steichen
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Utility and short-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-institution experience in 1103 patients.

Authors:  Robert R Cima; Rajesh Pendlimari; Stefan D Holubar; Jirawat Pattana-Arun; David W Larson; Eric J Dozois; Bruce G Wolff; John H Pemberton
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Authors:  Jensen T C Poon; Wai-Lun Law; Joe K M Fan; Oswen S H Lo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.

Authors:  Pui Yee Grace Choy; Ian P Bissett; James G Docherty; Bryan R Parry; Arend Merrie; Anita Fitzgerald
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

9.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Technique of air-leak testing of ileocolic anastomosis.

Authors:  T Poskus; M Luksta; M Kryzauskas
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Surgical teaching does not increase the risk of intraoperative adverse events.

Authors:  Basile Pache; Fabian Grass; Nicolas Fournier; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Right and Left Colectomy: Comparison of Functional Recovery.

Authors:  Anne Kummer; Juliette Slieker; Fabian Grass; Dieter Hahnloser; Nicolas Demartines; Martin Hübner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.