PURPOSE: Preclinical data suggest concurrent inhibition of VEGF, mTOR and EGFR pathways may augment antitumor and antiangiogenic effects compared to inhibition of each pathway alone. This study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase II dose and safety and tolerability of bevacizumab, everolimus and panitumumab drug combination. METHODS: Subjects with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of everolimus and flat dosing of panitumumab at 4.8 mg/kg and bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in cycle 1; toxicity evaluation was closely monitored throughout treatment. Treatment continued until disease progression or undesirable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-two subjects were evaluable for toxicity; 31 subjects were evaluable for tumor response. DLTs were observed in cohorts with everolimus at 10 and 5 mg daily and included grade 3 mucositis, skin rash and thrombocytopenia. Therefore, everolimus was dose-reduced to 5 mg three times weekly, which improved the tolerability of the treatment regimen. Common adverse events were skin rash/pruritus (91 %), mucositis/stomatitis (75 %), hypomagnesemia (72 %), hypocalcemia (56 %) and hypokalemia (50 %). There were 3 partial responses; an additional 10 subjects had stable disease ≥6 months. Three subjects with ovarian cancer and one with endometrial cancer achieved prolonged disease control ranging from 11 to >40 months. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II dose is everolimus at 5 mg three times weekly plus panitumumab at 4.8 mg/kg and bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. This dosing regimen has an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and appears to have moderate the clinical activity in refractory tumors.
PURPOSE: Preclinical data suggest concurrent inhibition of VEGF, mTOR and EGFR pathways may augment antitumor and antiangiogenic effects compared to inhibition of each pathway alone. This study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase II dose and safety and tolerability of bevacizumab, everolimus and panitumumab drug combination. METHODS: Subjects with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of everolimus and flat dosing of panitumumab at 4.8 mg/kg and bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in cycle 1; toxicity evaluation was closely monitored throughout treatment. Treatment continued until disease progression or undesirable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-two subjects were evaluable for toxicity; 31 subjects were evaluable for tumor response. DLTs were observed in cohorts with everolimus at 10 and 5 mg daily and included grade 3 mucositis, skin rash and thrombocytopenia. Therefore, everolimus was dose-reduced to 5 mg three times weekly, which improved the tolerability of the treatment regimen. Common adverse events were skin rash/pruritus (91 %), mucositis/stomatitis (75 %), hypomagnesemia (72 %), hypocalcemia (56 %) and hypokalemia (50 %). There were 3 partial responses; an additional 10 subjects had stable disease ≥6 months. Three subjects with ovarian cancer and one with endometrial cancer achieved prolonged disease control ranging from 11 to >40 months. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II dose is everolimus at 5 mg three times weekly plus panitumumab at 4.8 mg/kg and bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. This dosing regimen has an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and appears to have moderate the clinical activity in refractory tumors.
Authors: Elizabeth Buck; Alexandra Eyzaguirre; John D Haley; Neil W Gibson; Pablo Cagnoni; Kenneth K Iwata Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Elizabeth Buck; Alexandra Eyzaguirre; Eric Brown; Filippo Petti; Siobhan McCormack; John D Haley; Kenneth K Iwata; Neil W Gibson; Graeme Griffin Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Leonard B Saltz; Lee S Rosen; John L Marshall; Robert J Belt; Herbert I Hurwitz; S Gail Eckhardt; Emily K Bergsland; Daniel G Haller; A Craig Lockhart; Caio M Rocha Lima; Xin Huang; Samuel E DePrimo; Edna Chow-Maneval; Richard C Chao; Heinz J Lenz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Seiji Mabuchi; Deborah A Altomare; Denise C Connolly; Andres Klein-Szanto; Samuel Litwin; Matthew K Hoelzle; Harvey H Hensley; Thomas C Hamilton; Joseph R Testa Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Wenjuan Wu; Amir Onn; Takeshi Isobe; Satoshi Itasaka; Robert R Langley; Tomoaki Shitani; Keiko Shibuya; Ritsuko Komaki; Anderson J Ryan; Isaiah J Fidler; Roy S Herbst; Michael S O'Reilly Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Jingquan Jia; Andrew E Dellinger; Eric S Weiss; Anuradha Bulusu; Christel Rushing; Haiyan Li; Leigh A Howard; Neal Kaplan; Herbert Pang; Herbert I Hurwitz; Andrew B Nixon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Fatima Rangwala; Johanna C Bendell; Mark F Kozloff; Christy C Arrowood; Andrew Dellinger; Jennifer Meadows; Sandra Tourt-Uhlig; Jennifer Murphy; Kellen L Meadows; Aijing Starr; Samuel Broderick; John C Brady; Stephanie M Cushman; Michael A Morse; Hope E Uronis; S David Hsu; S Yousuf Zafar; James Wallace; Alexander N Starodub; John H Strickler; Herbert Pang; Andrew B Nixon; Herbert I Hurwitz Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Jo Morrison; Clemens Thoma; Richard J Goodall; Thomas J Lyons; Kezia Gaitskell; Alison J Wiggans; Andrew Bryant Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-10-16
Authors: Xiaochun Liu; Susan Kambrick; Siqing Fu; Aung Naing; Vivek Subbiah; George R Blumenschein; Bonnie S Glisson; Merrill S Kies; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Jennifer J Wheler; Ralph G Zinner; David S Hong; Razelle Kurzrock; Sarina A Piha-Paul Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-04-26
Authors: Heather J Bax; Debra H Josephs; Giulia Pellizzari; James F Spicer; Ana Montes; Sophia N Karagiannis Journal: MAbs Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 5.857