Literature DB >> 22637708

Of toothy grins and angry snarls--open mouth displays contribute to efficiency gains in search for emotional faces.

Gernot Horstmann1, Ottmar V Lipp, Stefanie I Becker.   

Abstract

The emotional face-in-a-crowd effect is widely cited, but its origin remains controversial, particularly with photorealistic stimuli. Recently, it has been suggested that one factor underlying the guidance of attention by a photorealistic emotional face in visual search might be the visibility of teeth, a hypothesis, however, that has not been studied systematically to date. The present experiments manipulate the visibility of teeth experimentally and orthogonally to facial emotion. Results suggest that much of the face-in-a-crowd effect with photorealistic emotional faces is due to visible teeth, and that the visibility of teeth can create a search advantage for either a happy or an angry target face when teeth visibility and facial emotion are confounded. Further analyses clarify that the teeth visibility primarily affects the speed with which neutral crowds are scanned, shedding new light on the mechanism that evokes differences in search efficiency for different emotional expressions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22637708     DOI: 10.1167/12.5.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  11 in total

1.  Facial expression recognition in peripheral versus central vision: role of the eyes and the mouth.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Andrés Fernández-Martín; Lauri Nummenmaa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-04-18

2.  Asymmetric neural responses for facial expressions and anti-expressions.

Authors:  O Scott Gwinn; Courtney N Matera; Sean F O'Neil; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Early event-related potentials to emotional faces differ for adults with autism spectrum disorder and by serotonin transporter genotype.

Authors:  Susan Faja; Geraldine Dawson; Elizabeth Aylward; Ellen M Wijsman; Sara Jane Webb
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Visual search efficiency is greater for human faces compared to animal faces.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Simpson; Haley L Husband; Krysten Yee; Alison Fullerton; Krisztina V Jakobsen
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2014

5.  Furious snarling: Teeth-exposure and anxiety-related attentional bias towards angry faces.

Authors:  Benedikt Emanuel Wirth; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Remembering who was where: A happy expression advantage for face identity-location binding in working memory.

Authors:  Sara Spotorno; Megan Evans; Margaret C Jackson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms.

Authors:  Qianru Xu; Chaoxiong Ye; Simeng Gu; Zhonghua Hu; Yi Lei; Xueyan Li; Lihui Huang; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Eye tracking the face in the crowd task: why are angry faces found more quickly?

Authors:  Jonathon R Shasteen; Noah J Sasson; Amy E Pinkham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Distractor Dwelling, Skipping, and Revisiting Determine Target Absent Performance in Difficult Visual Search.

Authors:  Gernot Horstmann; Arvid Herwig; Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.

Authors:  Benedikt Emanuel Wirth; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.