Literature DB >> 22634695

Methodologically rigorous clinical research.

Lynda J-S Yang1, Kate W-C Chang, Kevin C Chung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rigorous methodology increases the quality of clinical research by encouraging freedom from the biases inherent in clinical studies. As randomized controlled studies (clinical trial design) are rarely applicable to surgical research, the authors address the commonly used observational study designs and methodologies by presenting guidelines for rigor.
METHODS: The authors performed a review of study designs, including cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies and case series/reports, and biases and confounders of study design.
RESULTS: Details about biases and confounders at each study stage, study characteristics, rigor checklists, and published literature examples for each study design are summarized and presented in this report.
CONCLUSIONS: For those surgeons interested in pursuing clinical research, mastery of the principles of methodologic rigor is imperative in the context of evidence-based medicine and widespread publication of clinical studies. Knowledge of the study designs and their appropriate application, and strict adherence to study design methods can provide high-quality evidence to serve as the basis for rational clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22634695      PMCID: PMC3531969          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824eccb7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Reviewing the Record: Medical Record Reviews for Medical Toxicology Research.

Authors:  Jaiva Larsen; Mark B Mycyk; Trevonne M Thompson
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-07-31

2.  Associations Between Aging-Related Changes in Grip Strength and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea R Zammit; Annie Robitaille; Andrea M Piccinin; Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Scott M Hofer
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Leveling the field: Development of reliable scoring rubrics for quantitative and qualitative medical education research abstracts.

Authors:  Jaime Jordan; Laura R Hopson; Caroline Molins; Suzanne K Bentley; Nicole M Deiorio; Sally A Santen; Lalena M Yarris; Wendy C Coates; Michael A Gisondi
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-08-01

4.  Enabling a learning healthcare system with automated computer protocols that produce replicable and personalized clinician actions.

Authors:  Alan H Morris; Brian Stagg; Michael Lanspa; James Orme; Terry P Clemmer; Lindell K Weaver; Frank Thomas; Colin K Grissom; Ellie Hirshberg; Thomas D East; Carrie Jane Wallace; Michael P Young; Dean F Sittig; Antonio Pesenti; Michela Bombino; Eduardo Beck; Katherine A Sward; Charlene Weir; Shobha S Phansalkar; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; Roy Brower; Jonathon D Truwit; Jay Steingrub; R Duncan Hite; Douglas F Willson; Jerry J Zimmerman; Vinay M Nadkarni; Adrienne Randolph; Martha A Q Curley; Christopher J L Newth; Jacques Lacroix; Michael S D Agus; Kang H Lee; Bennett P deBoisblanc; R Scott Evans; Dean K Sorenson; Anthony Wong; Michael V Boland; David W Grainger; Willard H Dere; Alan S Crandall; Julio C Facelli; Stanley M Huff; Peter J Haug; Ulrike Pielmeier; Stephen E Rees; Dan S Karbing; Steen Andreassen; Eddy Fan; Roberta M Goldring; Kenneth I Berger; Beno W Oppenheimer; E Wesley Ely; Ognjen Gajic; Brian Pickering; David A Schoenfeld; Irena Tocino; Russell S Gonnering; Peter J Pronovost; Lucy A Savitz; Didier Dreyfuss; Arthur S Slutsky; James D Crapo; Derek Angus; Michael R Pinsky; Brent James; Donald Berwick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Oncoplastic breast surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: a comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  Ilmi Behluli; Pol-Edern Le Renard; Kamila Rozwag; Peter Oppelt; Andreas Kaufmann; Achim Schneider
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 1.872

6.  Quality of reporting of clinical trials in dogs and cats: An update.

Authors:  Jan M Sargeant; Mikayla Plishka; Audrey Ruple; Laura E Selmic; Sarah C Totton; Ellen R Vriezen
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.333

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.