Literature DB >> 22634652

An analysis of the experiences of 62 patients with moderate complications after full-face fat injection for augmentation.

Sung Min Kim1, Young Seok Kim, Jong Won Hong, Tai Suk Roh, Dong Kyun Rah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, fat injection has been performed across the globe and has several advantages. However, there have not been many studies regarding the relationship between complications and contributing factors. The authors analyzed factors present when complications occurred during fat injections into the face.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for 62 patients who had moderate complications among the 1261 persons who had received full-face fat injection between April of 2004 and July of 2008. Complications included chronic edema, calcification, fibrosis, acne, headache, dysesthesia, drooping, and irregularity.
RESULTS: There were no differences among the first, second, and third injection groups regarding age, body weight, height, or body mass index. However, there were statistically significant differences in injection amount and complication occurrence time (p < 0.0001). There were statistically significant differences in injection amount and complication occurrence time between the fresh and frozen fat (p < 0.0001). There were statistically significant differences regarding age, injection amount, and complication occurrence time according to the complication groups (p < 0.0001). There was also a difference between timing of the injection and the complication frequency (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.0001) and between fat status and the complication frequency (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Chronic edema, calcification, fibrosis, acne, headache, dysesthesia, drooping, and irregularity after full-face fat injection were observed as moderate complications. Although further study will be needed for the effective analysis of complications according to the number of injection or fat status, the authors found significant differences in age, complication occurrence time, and injection amount between some complication groups. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22634652     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecbb0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Cryopreserved autologous fat injections as a filler agent for facial augmentation: are they still safe?

Authors:  In Kyung Jeon; Hemin Lee; Jae Yong Shin; Sang Ho Oh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.759

2.  The General Registry of Autologous Fat Transfer: Concept, Design, and Analysis of Fat Grafting Complications.

Authors:  Surinder Kaur; J Peter Rubin; Jeffrey Gusenoff; Catherine A Sommers; Meghana G Shamsunder; Keith M Hume; Babak J Mehrara
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 5.169

Review 3.  Regenerative and stem cell-based techniques for facial rejuvenation.

Authors:  J Sarah Crowley; Amy Liu; Marek Dobke
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-06-08

4.  Comparisons between fresh and cryopreserved fat injections in facial lipofilling.

Authors:  Hyee Jae Yang; Sang Yoon Kang
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-20

Review 5.  Facial Fat Grafting (FFG): Worth the Risk? A Systematic Review of Complications and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Luigi Schiraldi; Gianluca Sapino; Joachim Meuli; Michele Maruccia; Mario Cherubino; Wassim Raffoul; Pietro G di Summa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.