AIM: Performance of high quality CPR is associated with improved resuscitation outcomes. This study investigates code leader ability to recall CPR error during post-event interviews when CPR recording/audiovisual feedback-enabled defibrillators are deployed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Physician code leaders were interviewed within 24h of 44 in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrests to assess their ability to recall if CPR error occurred during the event. Actual CPR quality was assessed using quantitative recording/feedback-enabled defibrillators. CPR error was defined as an overall average event chest compression (CC) rate <95/min, depth < 38 mm, ventilation rate >10/min, or any interruptions in CPR >10s. We hypothesized that code leaders would recall error when it actually occurred ≥ 75% of the time when assisted by audiovisual alerts from a CPR recording feedback-enabled defibrillators (analysis by χ(2)). RESULTS: 810 min from 44 cardiac arrest events yielded 40 complete data sets (actual and interview); ventilation data was available in 24. Actual CPR error was present in 3/40 events for rate, 4/40 for depth, 32/40 for interruptions >10s, and 17/24 for ventilation frequency. In post-event interviews, code leaders recalled these errors in 0/3 (0%) for rate, 0/4 (0%) for depth, and 19/32 (59%) for interruptions >10s. Code leaders recalled these CPR quality errors less than 75% of the time for rate (p=0.06), for depth (p<0.01), and for CPR interruption (p=0.04). Quantification of errors not recalled: missed rate error median=94 CC/min (IQR 93-95), missed depth error median=36 mm (IQR 35.5-36.5), missed CPR interruption >10s median=18s (IQR 14.4-28.9). Code leaders did recall the presence of excessive ventilation in 16/17 (94%) of events (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: Despite assistance by CPR recording/feedback-enabled defibrillators, pediatric code leaders fail to recall important CPR quality errors for CC rate, depth, and interruptions during post-cardiac arrest interviews.
AIM: Performance of high quality CPR is associated with improved resuscitation outcomes. This study investigates code leader ability to recall CPR error during post-event interviews when CPR recording/audiovisual feedback-enabled defibrillators are deployed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Physician code leaders were interviewed within 24h of 44 in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrests to assess their ability to recall if CPR error occurred during the event. Actual CPR quality was assessed using quantitative recording/feedback-enabled defibrillators. CPR error was defined as an overall average event chest compression (CC) rate <95/min, depth < 38 mm, ventilation rate >10/min, or any interruptions in CPR >10s. We hypothesized that code leaders would recall error when it actually occurred ≥ 75% of the time when assisted by audiovisual alerts from a CPR recording feedback-enabled defibrillators (analysis by χ(2)). RESULTS: 810 min from 44 cardiac arrest events yielded 40 complete data sets (actual and interview); ventilation data was available in 24. Actual CPR error was present in 3/40 events for rate, 4/40 for depth, 32/40 for interruptions >10s, and 17/24 for ventilation frequency. In post-event interviews, code leaders recalled these errors in 0/3 (0%) for rate, 0/4 (0%) for depth, and 19/32 (59%) for interruptions >10s. Code leaders recalled these CPR quality errors less than 75% of the time for rate (p=0.06), for depth (p<0.01), and for CPR interruption (p=0.04). Quantification of errors not recalled: missed rate error median=94 CC/min (IQR 93-95), missed depth error median=36 mm (IQR 35.5-36.5), missed CPR interruption >10s median=18s (IQR 14.4-28.9). Code leaders did recall the presence of excessive ventilation in 16/17 (94%) of events (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: Despite assistance by CPR recording/feedback-enabled defibrillators, pediatric code leaders fail to recall important CPR quality errors for CC rate, depth, and interruptions during post-cardiac arrest interviews.
Authors: Benjamin S Abella; Nathan Sandbo; Peter Vassilatos; Jason P Alvarado; Nicholas O'Hearn; Herbert N Wigder; Paul Hoffman; Kathleen Tynus; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Lance B Becker Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Benjamin S Abella; Dana P Edelson; Salem Kim; Elizabeth Retzer; Helge Myklebust; Anne M Barry; Nicholas O'Hearn; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Lance B Becker Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2007-01-26 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Dana Niles; Robert M Sutton; Aaron Donoghue; Mandip S Kalsi; Kathryn Roberts; Lori Boyle; Akira Nishisaki; Kristy B Arbogast; Mark Helfaer; Vinay Nadkarni Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Dianne L Atkins; Siobhan Everson-Stewart; Gena K Sears; Mohamud Daya; Martin H Osmond; Craig R Warden; Robert A Berg Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C Jessica Dine; Ronna E Gersh; Marion Leary; Barbara J Riegel; Lisa M Bellini; Benjamin S Abella Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Dana P Edelson; Barbara Litzinger; Vineet Arora; Deborah Walsh; Salem Kim; Diane S Lauderdale; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Lance B Becker; Benjamin S Abella Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-05-26
Authors: David Yamane; Patrick McCarville; Natalie Sullivan; Evan Kuhl; Carolyn Robin Lanam; Christopher Payette; Anahita Rahimi-Saber; Jennifer Rabjohns; Andrew D Sparks; Keith Boniface; Aaran Drake Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-10-20