Literature DB >> 22634333

Compound-specific effects of diverse neurodevelopmental toxicants on global gene expression in the neural embryonic stem cell test (ESTn).

P T Theunissen1, J F Robinson, J L A Pennings, M H van Herwijnen, J C S Kleinjans, A H Piersma.   

Abstract

Alternative assays for developmental toxicity testing are needed to reduce animal use in regulatory toxicology. The in vitro murine neural embryonic stem cell test (ESTn) was designed as an alternative for neurodevelopmental toxicity testing. The integration of toxicogenomic-based approaches may further increase predictivity as well as provide insight into underlying mechanisms of developmental toxicity. In the present study, we investigated concentration-dependent effects of six mechanistically diverse compounds, acetaldehyde (ACE), carbamazepine (CBZ), flusilazole (FLU), monoethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), penicillin G (PENG) and phenytoin (PHE), on the transcriptome and neural differentiation in the ESTn. All compounds with the exception of PENG altered ESTn morphology (cytotoxicity and neural differentiation) in a concentration-dependent manner. Compound induced gene expression changes and corresponding enriched gene ontology biological processes (GO-BP) were identified after 24h exposure at equipotent differentiation-inhibiting concentrations of the compounds. Both compound-specific and common gene expression changes were observed between subsets of tested compounds, in terms of significance, magnitude of regulation and functionality. For example, ACE, CBZ and FLU induced robust changes in number of significantly altered genes (≥ 687 genes) as well as a variety of GO-BP, as compared to MEHP, PHE and PENG (≤ 55 genes with no significant changes in GO-BP observed). Genes associated with developmentally related processes (embryonic morphogenesis, neuron differentiation, and Wnt signaling) showed diverse regulation after exposure to ACE, CBZ and FLU. In addition, gene expression and GO-BP enrichment showed concentration dependence, allowing discrimination of non-toxic versus toxic concentrations on the basis of transcriptomics. This information may be used to define adaptive versus toxic responses at the transcriptome level.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22634333     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2012.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  7 in total

1.  Anchoring a dynamic in vitro model of human neuronal differentiation to key processes of early brain development in vivo.

Authors:  Susanna H Wegner; Julie Juyoung Park; Tomomi Workman; Sanne A B Hermsen; Jim Wallace; Ian B Stanaway; Hee Yeon Kim; William C Griffith; Sungwoo Hong; Elaine M Faustman
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Effects of long-term endocrine disrupting compound exposure on Macaca mulatta embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Uros Midic; Kailey A Vincent; Catherine A VandeVoort; Keith E Latham
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach.

Authors:  Anne K Krug; Raivo Kolde; John A Gaspar; Eugen Rempel; Nina V Balmer; Kesavan Meganathan; Kinga Vojnits; Mathurin Baquié; Tanja Waldmann; Roberto Ensenat-Waser; Smita Jagtap; Richard M Evans; Stephanie Julien; Hedi Peterson; Dimitra Zagoura; Suzanne Kadereit; Daniel Gerhard; Isaia Sotiriadou; Michael Heke; Karthick Natarajan; Margit Henry; Johannes Winkler; Rosemarie Marchan; Luc Stoppini; Sieto Bosgra; Joost Westerhout; Miriam Verwei; Jaak Vilo; Andreas Kortenkamp; Jürgen Hescheler; Ludwig Hothorn; Susanne Bremer; Christoph van Thriel; Karl-Heinz Krause; Jan G Hengstler; Jörg Rahnenführer; Marcel Leist; Agapios Sachinidis
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  International STakeholder NETwork (ISTNET): creating a developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing road map for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Anna Bal-Price; Kevin M Crofton; Marcel Leist; Sandra Allen; Michael Arand; Timo Buetler; Nathalie Delrue; Rex E FitzGerald; Thomas Hartung; Tuula Heinonen; Helena Hogberg; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Walter Lichtensteiger; Daniela Oggier; Martin Paparella; Marta Axelstad; Aldert Piersma; Eva Rached; Benoît Schilter; Gabriele Schmuck; Luc Stoppini; Enrico Tongiorgi; Manuela Tiramani; Florianne Monnet-Tschudi; Martin F Wilks; Timo Ylikomi; Ellen Fritsche
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 5.  Prospects and Frontiers of Stem Cell Toxicology.

Authors:  Shuyu Liu; Nuoya Yin; Francesco Faiola
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.272

6.  Anticonvulsants and Chromatin-Genes Expression: A Systems Biology Investigation.

Authors:  Thayne Woycinck Kowalski; Julia do Amaral Gomes; Mariléa Furtado Feira; Ágata de Vargas Dupont; Mariana Recamonde-Mendoza; Fernanda Sales Luiz Vianna
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Neuronal differentiation pathways and compound-induced developmental neurotoxicity in the human neural progenitor cell test (hNPT) revealed by RNA-seq.

Authors:  Victoria C de Leeuw; Conny T M van Oostrom; Paul F K Wackers; Jeroen L A Pennings; Hennie M Hodemaekers; Aldert H Piersma; Ellen V S Hessel
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 8.943

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.