Hiroshi Takasaki1, Chi-Wen Chien, Venerina Johnston, Julia Treleaven, Gwendolen Jull. 1. National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Clinical Research Excellence - Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. h.takasaki@uq.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity and reliability of the Perceived Deficit Questionnaire (PDQ) for use in people with chronic whiplash-associated disorders. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Tertiary institution. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=105) with chronic whiplash-associated disorders and asymptomatic controls (n=50). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 20-item PDQ inclusive of 4 sections (attention/concentration, retrospective memory, prospective memory, and organization/planning) rated on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Internal construct validity of the PDQ was examined by Rasch analysis, confirming the appropriateness of its 5-point scale and the unidimensionality of each section after modification by eliminating 1 item each from the attention/concentration and retrospective memory sections. Preliminary evidence was also gained for external construct validity (convergent validity) of the modified PDQ by demonstrating significant (P<.05) correlations of all sections with a global measure of disability due to neck pain (the Neck Disability Index). The whiplash group demonstrated significantly (P<.05) higher scores in each section of the modified PDQ than did the control group, indicating evidence for discriminant validity. In addition, the modified PDQ demonstrated good internal consistency (Rasch-generated reliability >.8) and acceptable test-retest reliability with 1-month interval (intraclass correlation coefficients >.8). CONCLUSIONS: The modified PDQ appears to be a valid and reliable questionnaire and could be used quickly in clinical practice to gain a basic understanding of perceived cognitive symptoms in people with chronic whiplash-associated disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity and reliability of the Perceived Deficit Questionnaire (PDQ) for use in people with chronic whiplash-associated disorders. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Tertiary institution. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=105) with chronic whiplash-associated disorders and asymptomatic controls (n=50). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 20-item PDQ inclusive of 4 sections (attention/concentration, retrospective memory, prospective memory, and organization/planning) rated on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Internal construct validity of the PDQ was examined by Rasch analysis, confirming the appropriateness of its 5-point scale and the unidimensionality of each section after modification by eliminating 1 item each from the attention/concentration and retrospective memory sections. Preliminary evidence was also gained for external construct validity (convergent validity) of the modified PDQ by demonstrating significant (P<.05) correlations of all sections with a global measure of disability due to neck pain (the Neck Disability Index). The whiplash group demonstrated significantly (P<.05) higher scores in each section of the modified PDQ than did the control group, indicating evidence for discriminant validity. In addition, the modified PDQ demonstrated good internal consistency (Rasch-generated reliability >.8) and acceptable test-retest reliability with 1-month interval (intraclass correlation coefficients >.8). CONCLUSIONS: The modified PDQ appears to be a valid and reliable questionnaire and could be used quickly in clinical practice to gain a basic understanding of perceived cognitive symptoms in people with chronic whiplash-associated disorders.
Authors: Hiroshi Takasaki; Kazuki Kikkawa; Hiroki Chiba; Yusuke Handa; Albert Sesé-Abad; Juan Carlos Fernández-Domínguez Journal: Prog Rehabil Med Date: 2021-08-27