Literature DB >> 22634219

Involvement of the cerebellar cortex and nuclei in verbal and visuospatial working memory: a 7 T fMRI study.

M Thürling1, H Hautzel, M Küper, M R Stefanescu, S Maderwald, M E Ladd, D Timmann.   

Abstract

The first aim of the present study was to extend previous findings of similar cerebellar cortical areas being involved in verbal and spatial n-back working memory to the level of the cerebellar nuclei. The second aim was to investigate whether different areas of the cerebellar cortex and nuclei contribute to different working memory tasks (n-back vs. Sternberg tasks). Young and healthy subjects participated in two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies using a 7 T MR scanner with its increased signal-to-noise ratio. One group of subjects (n=21) performed an abstract and a verbal version of an n-back task contrasting a 2-back and 0-back condition. Another group of subjects (n=23) performed an abstract and a verbal version of a Sternberg task contrasting a high load and a low load condition. A block design was used. For image processing of the dentate nuclei, a recently developed region of interest (ROI) driven normalization method of the dentate nuclei was applied (Diedrichsen et al., 2011). Whereas activated areas of the cerebellar cortex and dentate nuclei were not significantly different comparing the abstract and verbal versions of the n-back task, activation in the abstract and verbal Sternberg tasks was significantly different. In both n-back tasks activation was most prominent at the border of lobules VI and Crus I, within lobule VII, and within the more caudal parts of the dentate nucleus bilaterally. In Sternberg tasks the most prominent activations were found in lobule VI extending into Crus I on the right. In the verbal Sternberg task activation was significantly larger within right lobule VI compared to the abstract Sternberg task and compared to the verbal n-back task. Activations of rostral parts of the dentate were most prominent in the verbal Sternberg task, whereas activation of caudal parts predominated in the abstract Sternberg task. On the one hand, the lack of difference between abstract and verbal n-back tasks and the lack of significant lateralization suggest a more general contribution of the cerebellum to working memory regardless of the modality. On the other hand, the focus of activation in right lobule VI in the verbal Sternberg task suggests specific cerebellar contributions to verbal working memory. The verbal Sternberg task emphasizes maintenance of stimuli via phonological rehearsal, whereas central executive demands prevail in n-back tasks. Based on the model of working memory by Baddeley and Hitch (1974), the present results show that different regions of the cerebellum support functions of the central executive system and one of the subsidiary systems, the phonological loop.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22634219     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  23 in total

1.  Cerebellar Contribution to Context Processing in Extinction Learning and Recall.

Authors:  D-I Chang; S Lissek; T M Ernst; M Thürling; M Uengoer; M Tegenthoff; M E Ladd; D Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Cerebellar tDCS Modulates Neural Circuits during Semantic Prediction: A Combined tDCS-fMRI Study.

Authors:  Anila M D'Mello; Peter E Turkeltaub; Catherine J Stoodley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Consensus paper: Language and the cerebellum: an ongoing enigma.

Authors:  Peter Mariën; Herman Ackermann; Michael Adamaszek; Caroline H S Barwood; Alan Beaton; John Desmond; Elke De Witte; Angela J Fawcett; Ingo Hertrich; Michael Küper; Maria Leggio; Cherie Marvel; Marco Molinari; Bruce E Murdoch; Roderick I Nicolson; Jeremy D Schmahmann; Catherine J Stoodley; Markus Thürling; Dagmar Timmann; Ellen Wouters; Wolfram Ziegler
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Cerebellar fMRI Activation Increases with Increasing Working Memory Demands.

Authors:  M Küper; P Kaschani; M Thürling; M R Stefanescu; R G Burciu; S Göricke; S Maderwald; M E Ladd; H Hautzel; D Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  The Cerebellum and Beauty: The Impact of the Cerebellum in Art Experience and Creativity.

Authors:  Michael Adamaszek; Zaira Cattaneo; Andrea Ciricugno; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Executive dysfunction in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3.

Authors:  Itaru Tamura; Asako Takei; Shinsuke Hamada; Hiroyuki Soma; Michio Nonaka; Sanae Homma; Fumio Moriwaka
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Male veterans with PTSD exhibit aberrant neural dynamics during working memory processing: an MEG study.

Authors:  Timothy J McDermott; Amy S Badura-Brack; Katherine M Becker; Tara J Ryan; Maya M Khanna; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.186

8.  The Cerebello-Hypothalamic and Hypothalamo-Cerebellar Pathways via Superior and Middle Cerebellar Peduncle in the Rat.

Authors:  Safiye Çavdar; Merve Özgur; Yasemin Kuvvet; Husniye Hacıoğlu Bay
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 9.  Imaging human engrams using 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tom Willems; Katharina Henke
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.753

10.  Proceedings of the workshop on Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia and Cortical Connections Unmasked in Health and Disorder held in Brno, Czech Republic, October 17th, 2013.

Authors:  Martin Bareš; Richard Apps; Zora Kikinis; Dagmar Timmann; Gulin Oz; James J Ashe; Michaela Loft; Stella Koutsikou; Nadia Cerminara; Khalaf O Bushara; Tomáš Kašpárek
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.