Literature DB >> 22634216

Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: parietal interactions.

Céline R Gillebert1, Mads Dyrholm, Signe Vangkilde, Søren Kyllingsbæk, Ronald Peeters, Rik Vandenberghe.   

Abstract

The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) has been implicated in selective attention as well as visual short-term memory (VSTM). To contrast mechanisms of target selection, distracter filtering, and access to VSTM, we combined behavioral testing, computational modeling and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sixteen healthy subjects participated in a change detection task in which we manipulated both target and distracter set sizes. We directly compared the IPS response as a function of the number of targets and distracters in the display and in VSTM. When distracters were not present, the posterior and middle segments of IPS showed the predicted asymptotic activity increase with an increasing target set size. When distracters were added to a single target, activity also increased as predicted. However, the addition of distracters to multiple targets suppressed both middle and posterior IPS activities, thereby displaying a significant interaction between the two factors. The interaction between target and distracter set size in IPS could not be accounted for by a simple explanation in terms of number of items accessing VSTM. Instead, it led us to a model where items accessing VSTM receive differential weights depending on their behavioral relevance, and secondly, a suppressive effect originates during the selection phase when multiple targets and multiple distracters are simultaneously present. The reverse interaction between target and distracter set size was significant in the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), where activity was highest for a single target compared to any other condition. Our study reconciles the role of middle IPS in attentional selection and biased competition with its role in VSTM access.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22634216     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  24 in total

1.  Attentional weights in vision as products of spatial and nonspatial components.

Authors:  Maria Nordfang; Camilla Staugaard; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

2.  The developmental neural substrates of item and serial order components of verbal working memory.

Authors:  Lucie Attout; Laura Ordonez Magro; Arnaud Szmalec; Steve Majerus
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Specific Visual Subregions of TPJ Mediate Reorienting of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Elisha P Merriam; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Visual salience improves spatial working memory via enhanced parieto-temporal functional connectivity.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Structural Variability within Frontoparietal Networks and Individual Differences in Attentional Functions: An Approach Using the Theory of Visual Attention.

Authors:  Magdalena Chechlacz; Celine R Gillebert; Signe A Vangkilde; Anders Petersen; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Parietal substrates for dimensional effects in visual search: evidence from lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Sandra Utz; Glyn W Humphreys; Magdalena Chechlacz
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Beyond trial types.

Authors:  Mads Dyrholm; Signe Vangkilde; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-04

8.  Dissociations between spatial-attentional processes within parietal cortex: insights from hybrid spatial cueing and change detection paradigms.

Authors:  Rik Vandenberghe; Céline R Gillebert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Blinded by the load: attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Diane M Beck; Nikos Konstantinou
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Ana Torralbo; Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.