Literature DB >> 22633723

Therapy and outcomes in massive pulmonary embolism from the Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry.

Brian W Lin1, Donald H Schreiber, Gigi Liu, Beau Briese, Brian Hiestand, David Slattery, Jeffrey A Kline, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Charles V Pollack.   

Abstract

STUDY AIM: Clinical guidelines recommend fibrinolysis or embolectomy for acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) (MPE). However, actual therapy and outcomes of emergency department (ED) patients with MPE have not previously been reported. We characterize the current management of ED patients with MPE in a US registry.
METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter registry of ED patients with confirmed PE was conducted from 2006 to 2008. Massive PE was defined as PE with an initial systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg. We compared inpatient and 30-day mortality, bleeding complications, and recurrent venous thromboembolism.
RESULTS: Of 1875 patients enrolled, 58 (3.1%) had MPE. There was no difference in frequency of parenteral anticoagulation (98.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 90.5-101.6] vs 98.5% [95% CI, 97.9-99.1], P = .902) between patients with and without MPE. Fibrinolytic therapy and embolectomy were infrequently used but were used more in patients with MPE than in patients without MPE (12.1% [95% CI, 3.7-20.5] vs 2.4% [95% CI, 1.7-3.1], P < .001, and 3.4% [95% CI, 0.0-8.1] vs 0.7% [95% CI, 0.3-1.1], P = .022, respectively). Comparison of outcomes revealed higher all-cause inpatient mortality (13.8% [95% CI, 4.9-22.7] vs 3.0% [95% CI, 2.2-3.8], P < .001), higher risk of inpatient bleeding complications (10.3% [95% CI, 2.5-18.1] vs 3.5% [95% CI, 2.7-4.3], P = .007), and a higher 30-day mortality (14.0% [95% CI, 4.4-23.6] vs 1.8% [95% CI, 1.2-2.4], P < .001) for patients with MPE.
CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary registry of ED patients, MPE mortality was 4-fold higher than patients without MPE, yet only 12% of the MPE cohort received fibrinolytic therapy. Variability exists between the treatment of MPE and current recommendations.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633723     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  15 in total

Review 1.  Endothelial nanomedicine for the treatment of pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Jacob S Brenner; Colin Greineder; Vladimir Shuvaev; Vladimir Muzykantov
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 6.648

2.  [Acute pulmonary embolism: still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge?]

Authors:  R Felgendreher; D Härtel; J Brockmeier; K Bramlage; T Aschenbrenner; J Götz; P Bramlage; U Tebbe
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 3.  Findings From 12-lead Electrocardiography That Predict Circulatory Shock From Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacob D Shopp; Lauren K Stewart; Thomas W Emmett; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 4.  Thrombolysis in hemodynamically unstable patients: still underused: a review based on multicenter prospective registries on acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Marco Zuin; Gianluca Rigatelli; Giovanni Zuliani; Pietro Zonzin; Daggubati Ramesh; Loris Roncon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Effectiveness and safety of thrombolytic therapy in elderly patients with pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Göktürk İpek; Mehmet Baran Karataş; Tolga Onuk; Barış Güngör; Burcu Yüzbaş; Muhammed Keskin; Ozan Tanık; Ahmet Oz; Mert İlker Hayıroğlu; Osman Bolca
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Comparison of isoflurane and α-chloralose in an anesthetized swine model of acute pulmonary embolism producing right ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Daren M Beam; Evandro M Neto-Neves; William B Stubblefield; Nathan J Alves; Johnathan D Tune; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.982

7.  Comparison of LMWH versus UFH for hemorrhage and hospital mortality in the treatment of acute massive pulmonary thromboembolism after thrombolytic treatment : randomized controlled parallel group study.

Authors:  Elif Yilmazel Ucar; Metin Akgun; Omer Araz; Hakan Tas; Bugra Kerget; Mehmet Meral; Hasan Kaynar; Leyla Saglam
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 8.  Risk stratification and management of acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Cecilia Becattini; Giancarlo Agnelli
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

9.  Mechanical breakdown and thrombolysis in subacute massive pulmonary embolism: A prospective trial.

Authors:  Bishav Mohan; Shibba Takkar Chhabra; Naved Aslam; Gurpreet Singh Wander; Naresh Kumar Sood; Sumati Verma; Anil Kumar Mehra; Sarit Sharma
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-26

10.  Impact of catheter fragmentation followed by local intrapulmonary thrombolysis in acute high risk pulmonary embolism as primary therapy.

Authors:  Bishav Mohan; Naved Aslam; Anil Kumar Mehra; Shibba Takkar Chhabra; Praneet Wander; Rohit Tandon; Gurpreet Singh Wander
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.