Literature DB >> 22633684

Subcritical crack growth and in vitro lifetime prediction of resin composites with different filler distributions.

Bárbara P Ornaghi1, Marcia M Meier, Vinícius Rosa, Paulo F Cesar, Ulrich Lohbauer, Roberto R Braga.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Verify the influence of different filler distributions on the subcritical crack growth (SCG) susceptibility, Weibull parameters (m and σ(0)) and longevity estimated by the strength-probability-time (SPT) diagram of experimental resin composites.
METHODS: Four composites were prepared, each one containing 59 vol% of glass powder with different filler sizes (d(50)=0.5; 0.9; 1.2 and 1.9 μm) and distributions. Granulometric analyses of glass powders were done by a laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Sald-7001, Shimadzu, USA). SCG parameters (n and σ(f0)) were determined by dynamic fatigue (10(-2) to 10(2) MPa/s) using a biaxial flexural device (12 × 1.2 mm; n=10). Twenty extra specimens of each composite were tested at 10(0) MPa/s to determine m and σ(0). Specimens were stored in water at 37°C for 24 h. Fracture surfaces were analyzed under SEM.
RESULTS: In general, the composites with broader filler distribution (C0.5 and C1.9) presented better results in terms of SCG susceptibility and longevity. C0.5 and C1.9 presented higher n values (respectively, 31.2 ± 6.2(a) and 34.7 ± 7.4(a)). C1.2 (166.42 ± 0.01(a)) showed the highest and C0.5 (158.40 ± 0.02(d)) the lowest σ(f0) value (in MPa). Weibull parameters did not vary significantly (m: 6.6 to 10.6 and σ(0):170.6 to 176.4 MPa). Predicted reductions in failure stress (P(f)=5%) for a lifetime of 10 years were approximately 45% for C0.5 and C1.9 and 65% for C0.9 and C1.2. Crack propagation occurred through the polymeric matrix around the fillers and all the fracture surfaces showed brittle fracture features. SIGNIFICANCE: Composites with broader granulometric distribution showed higher resistance to SCG and, consequently, higher longevity in vitro.
Copyright © 2012 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633684     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  5 in total

1.  Effect of thermocycling on flexural strength and weibull statistics of machinable glass-ceramic and composite resin.

Authors:  Chaimongkon Peampring; Sasiwimol Sanohkan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-20

2.  Mechanical performance of novel bioactive glass containing dental restorative composites.

Authors:  D Khvostenko; J C Mitchell; T J Hilton; J L Ferracane; J J Kruzic
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Reliability, failure probability, and strength of resin-based materials for CAD/CAM restorations.

Authors:  Kiatlin Lim; Adrian U-Jin Yap; Shruti Vidhawan Agarwalla; Keson Beng-Choon Tan; Vinicius Rosa
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged resin nanoceramics.

Authors:  Meryem Gülce Subaşı; Gülce Alp
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Hydro-Thermal Fatigue of Polymer Matrix Composite Biomaterials.

Authors:  Daniel Pieniak; Krzysztof Przystupa; Agata Walczak; Agata M Niewczas; Aneta Krzyzak; Grzegorz Bartnik; Leszek Gil; Paweł Lonkwic
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.