Literature DB >> 22633624

Phase II study of vinorelbine and continuous low doses cyclophosphamide in children and young adults with a relapsed or refractory malignant solid tumour: good tolerance profile and efficacy in rhabdomyosarcoma--a report from the Société Française des Cancers et leucémies de l'Enfant et de l'adolescent (SFCE).

Véronique Minard-Colin1, Jean-Laurent Ichante, Laurent Nguyen, Angelo Paci, Daniel Orbach, Christophe Bergeron, Anne-Sophie Defachelles, Nicolas André, Nadège Corradini, Claudine Schmitt, Marie-Dominique Tabone, Pascale Blouin, Nicolas Sirvent, Gisele Goma, Birgit Geoerger, Odile Oberlin.   

Abstract

AIM: This phase II study evaluated efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of combination intravenous vinorelbine (VNL) and continuous low doses oral cyclophosphamide (CPM) combination in children and young adults with a recurrent or refractory solid tumour.
METHODS: A total of 117 patients (median age, 12 years) within six disease strata received intravenous VNL 25mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle combined with continuous daily oral CPM 25mg/m(2). Tumour response was assessed every two cycles according to WHO (World Health Organisation) criteria. PK of VNL was investigated in a subset of 18 patients aged 4-15 years.
RESULTS: In rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) (n=50), the best overall response rate (ORR) was 36% with four complete (8%) and 14 partial responses (28%). The best ORR was 13% in Ewing's sarcoma (n=15), 6% in non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma (n=16) and 6% in neuroblastoma (n=16). No response was observed in osteosarcoma (n=10) and medulloblastoma (n=7). The main grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (38%). Other severe toxicities were limited with 3% of peripheral neuropathy and no haemorrhagic cystitis. The PK analysis revealed equivalent blood exposure to VNL between children >4 years and adult series when the VNL dose was based on the body surface area-based dosing. CONCLUDING STATEMENT: In heavily pre-treated children, VNL combined with CPM showed an interesting response rate in RMS and an acceptable toxicity profile supporting further evaluation of these agents in phase III trials.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633624     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenomics of second-line drugs used for treatment of unresponsive or relapsed osteosarcoma patients.

Authors:  Claudia M Hattinger; Serena Vella; Elisa Tavanti; Marilù Fanelli; Piero Picci; Massimo Serra
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 2.  Peripheral neuropathy in children and adolescents treated for cancer.

Authors:  Kari L Bjornard; Laura S Gilchrist; Hiroto Inaba; Barthelemy Diouf; Marilyn J Hockenberry; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Daniel C Bowers; M Eileen Dolan; Nicole J Ullrich; William E Evans; Kirsten K Ness
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-09-01

3.  Anacolosins A-F and Corymbulosins X and Y, Clerodane Diterpenes from Anacolosa clarkii Exhibiting Cytotoxicity toward Pediatric Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Shengxin Cai; April L Risinger; Cora L Petersen; Tanja Grkovic; Barry R O'Keefe; Susan L Mooberry; Robert H Cichewicz
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.050

Review 4.  Metronomics: towards personalized chemotherapy?

Authors:  Nicolas André; Manon Carré; Eddy Pasquier
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  An update on rhabdomyosarcoma risk stratification and the rationale for current and future Children's Oncology Group clinical trials.

Authors:  Josephine H Haduong; Christine M Heske; Wendy Allen-Rhoades; Wei Xue; Lisa A Teot; David A Rodeberg; Sarah S Donaldson; Aaron Weiss; Douglas S Hawkins; Rajkumar Venkatramani
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 6.  Systemic therapy in pediatric-type soft-tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  K M Ingley; S Cohen-Gogo; A A Gupta
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Optimal management of Ewing sarcoma family of tumors: recent developments in systemic therapy.

Authors:  Cormac Owens; Lesleigh S Abbott; Abha A Gupta
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.022

8.  Early and late adverse renal effects after potentially nephrotoxic treatment for childhood cancer.

Authors:  Esmee Cm Kooijmans; Arend Bökenkamp; Nic S Tjahjadi; Jesse M Tettero; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Helena Jh van der Pal; Margreet A Veening
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-11

Review 9.  Rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck in children.

Authors:  Joanna Radzikowska; Wojciech Kukwa; Andrzej Kukwa; Anna Czarnecka; Antoni Krzeski
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2015-02-13

Review 10.  Medulloblastoma in children and adolescents: a systematic review of contemporary phase I and II clinical trials and biology update.

Authors:  Francisco Bautista; Victoria Fioravantti; Teresa de Rojas; Fernando Carceller; Luis Madero; Alvaro Lassaletta; Lucas Moreno
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.