AIM: This phase II study evaluated efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of combination intravenous vinorelbine (VNL) and continuous low doses oral cyclophosphamide (CPM) combination in children and young adults with a recurrent or refractory solid tumour. METHODS: A total of 117 patients (median age, 12 years) within six disease strata received intravenous VNL 25mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle combined with continuous daily oral CPM 25mg/m(2). Tumour response was assessed every two cycles according to WHO (World Health Organisation) criteria. PK of VNL was investigated in a subset of 18 patients aged 4-15 years. RESULTS: In rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) (n=50), the best overall response rate (ORR) was 36% with four complete (8%) and 14 partial responses (28%). The best ORR was 13% in Ewing's sarcoma (n=15), 6% in non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma (n=16) and 6% in neuroblastoma (n=16). No response was observed in osteosarcoma (n=10) and medulloblastoma (n=7). The main grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (38%). Other severe toxicities were limited with 3% of peripheral neuropathy and no haemorrhagic cystitis. The PK analysis revealed equivalent blood exposure to VNL between children >4 years and adult series when the VNL dose was based on the body surface area-based dosing. CONCLUDING STATEMENT: In heavily pre-treated children, VNL combined with CPM showed an interesting response rate in RMS and an acceptable toxicity profile supporting further evaluation of these agents in phase III trials.
AIM: This phase II study evaluated efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of combination intravenous vinorelbine (VNL) and continuous low doses oral cyclophosphamide (CPM) combination in children and young adults with a recurrent or refractory solid tumour. METHODS: A total of 117 patients (median age, 12 years) within six disease strata received intravenous VNL 25mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle combined with continuous daily oral CPM 25mg/m(2). Tumour response was assessed every two cycles according to WHO (World Health Organisation) criteria. PK of VNL was investigated in a subset of 18 patients aged 4-15 years. RESULTS: In rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) (n=50), the best overall response rate (ORR) was 36% with four complete (8%) and 14 partial responses (28%). The best ORR was 13% in Ewing's sarcoma (n=15), 6% in non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma (n=16) and 6% in neuroblastoma (n=16). No response was observed in osteosarcoma (n=10) and medulloblastoma (n=7). The main grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (38%). Other severe toxicities were limited with 3% of peripheral neuropathy and no haemorrhagic cystitis. The PK analysis revealed equivalent blood exposure to VNL between children >4 years and adult series when the VNL dose was based on the body surface area-based dosing. CONCLUDING STATEMENT: In heavily pre-treated children, VNL combined with CPM showed an interesting response rate in RMS and an acceptable toxicity profile supporting further evaluation of these agents in phase III trials.
Authors: Kari L Bjornard; Laura S Gilchrist; Hiroto Inaba; Barthelemy Diouf; Marilyn J Hockenberry; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Daniel C Bowers; M Eileen Dolan; Nicole J Ullrich; William E Evans; Kirsten K Ness Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2018-09-01
Authors: Shengxin Cai; April L Risinger; Cora L Petersen; Tanja Grkovic; Barry R O'Keefe; Susan L Mooberry; Robert H Cichewicz Journal: J Nat Prod Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 4.050
Authors: Josephine H Haduong; Christine M Heske; Wendy Allen-Rhoades; Wei Xue; Lisa A Teot; David A Rodeberg; Sarah S Donaldson; Aaron Weiss; Douglas S Hawkins; Rajkumar Venkatramani Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Esmee Cm Kooijmans; Arend Bökenkamp; Nic S Tjahjadi; Jesse M Tettero; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Helena Jh van der Pal; Margreet A Veening Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-03-11
Authors: Francisco Bautista; Victoria Fioravantti; Teresa de Rojas; Fernando Carceller; Luis Madero; Alvaro Lassaletta; Lucas Moreno Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 4.452