Literature DB >> 22633557

Is maximum stimulation intensity required in the assessment of muscle activation capacity?

Theodoros M Bampouras1, Neil D Reeves, Vasilios Baltzopoulos, David A Jones, Constantinos N Maganaris.   

Abstract

Voluntary activation assessment using the interpolation twitch technique (ITT) has almost invariably been done using maximal stimulation intensity, i.e., an intensity beyond which no additional joint moment or external force is produced by increasing further the intensity of stimulation. The aim of the study was to identify the minimum stimulation intensity at which percutaneous ITT yields valid results. Maximal stimulation intensity and the force produced at that intensity were identified for the quadriceps muscle using percutaneous electrodes in eight active men. The stimulation intensities producing 10-90% (in 10% increments) of that force were determined and subsequently applied during isometric contractions at 90% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) via twitch doublets. Muscle activation was calculated with the ITT and pain scores were obtained for each stimulation intensity and compared to the respective values at maximum stimulation intensity. Muscle activation at maximal stimulation intensity was 91.6 (2.5)%. The lowest stimulation intensity yielding comparable muscle activation results to maximal stimulation was 50% (88.8 (3.9)%, p < 0.05). Pain score at maximal stimulation intensity was 6.6 (1.5) cm and it was significantly reduced at 60% stimulation intensity (3.7 (1.5) cm, p < 0.05) compared to maximal stimulation intensity. Submaximal stimulation can produce valid ITT results while reducing the discomfort obtained by the subjects, widening the assessment of ITT to situations where discomfort may otherwise impede maximal electrostimulation.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633557     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  4 in total

1.  The role of agonist and antagonist muscles in explaining isometric knee extension torque variation with hip joint angle.

Authors:  Theodoros M Bampouras; Neil D Reeves; Vasilios Baltzopoulos; Constantinos N Maganaris
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Short vs. long pulses for testing knee extensor neuromuscular properties: does it matter?

Authors:  Caroline Giroux; Boris Roduit; Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Jacques Duchateau; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The effect of muscle fatigue on stimulus intensity requirements for central and peripheral fatigue quantification.

Authors:  Daria Neyroud; Alexia Vallotton; Guillaume Y Millet; Bengt Kayser; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Quantification of Neuromuscular Fatigue: What Do We Do Wrong and Why?

Authors:  Nicolas Place; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.