Literature DB >> 22633270

Universal maternal cervical length screening during the second trimester: pros and cons of a strategy to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery.

Samuel Parry1, Hyagriv Simhan, Michal Elovitz, Jay Iams.   

Abstract

Three large randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone or cervical cerclage to prevent preterm delivery have been published over the past several years. None of these trials demonstrate proven efficacy for universal cervical length screening and cerclage placement in women with short cervical length. However, universal cervical length screening and treatment with daily vaginal progesterone in women with short cervical length reduces the risk of preterm birth, but large numbers of women must be screened to prevent a relatively small number of preterm deliveries. Issues that should be considered while implementing universal cervical length screening include: (1) standards of quality and reproducibility for transvaginal ultrasound cervical length ascertainment; (2) implications of screening on the application of therapeutic strategies to populations not known to benefit (so-called "indication creep"); and (3) willingness of obstetricians to prescribe vaginal progesterone formulations that are not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for preterm birth prevention. Optimal strategies to employ cervical ultrasound and progesterone treatment might be revealed by additional studies investigating cervical length cutoffs, frequency of screening, selective screening in higher-risk groups, and the use of transabdominal cervical length screening as a surrogate for transvaginal cervical length screening.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633270     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  11 in total

1.  Injectable silk-based biomaterials for cervical tissue augmentation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Joseph E Brown; Benjamin P Partlow; Alison M Berman; Michael D House; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes.

Authors:  Lorene A Temming; Jennifer K Durst; Methodius G Tuuli; Molly J Stout; Jeffrey M Dicke; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Progesterone to prevent spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Lami Yeo; Piya Chaemsaithong; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Inhibitory effect of progesterone on cervical tissue formation in a three-dimensional culture system with human cervical fibroblasts.

Authors:  Michael House; Serkalem Tadesse-Telila; Errol R Norwitz; Simona Socrate; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 5.  Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo da Fonseca; George Creasy; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Precocious cervical ripening as a screening target to predict spontaneous preterm delivery among asymptomatic singleton pregnancies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qing Li; Mathew Reeves; John Owen; Louis G Keith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Maternal Characteristics, Short Mid-Trimester Cervical Length, and Preterm Delivery.

Authors:  Soo Hyun Cho; Kyo Hoon Park; Eun Young Jung; Jung Kyung Joo; Ji Ae Jang; Ha Na Yoo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Cervical length varies considering different populations and gestational outcomes: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T G Bortoletto; T V Silva; A Borovac-Pinheiro; C M Pereira; A D Silva; M S França; A R Hatanaka; J P Argenton; R Passini; B W Mol; J G Cecatti; R C Pacagnella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Effect of a Universal Cervical Length Screening Program on Antepartum Management and Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Scott A Shainker; Anna M Modest; Michele R Hacker; Steven J Ralston
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2016-04

10.  Can the cervical length in mid-trimester predict the use of vacuum in vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Jee Yoon Park; Sun Min Kim; Jeenah Sohn; Sejin Kim; Eunjin Song; Byoung Jae Kim; Hye Won Jeon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.