BACKGROUND: Given the considerable variation in care of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) among centers that results in differences in outcome among these patients, a new intensity of care quality metrics has been proposed. This study aimed to validate the new ICH-specific intensity of care quality metrics. METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients with ICH who were admitted within 24 hours of symptom onset were identified. Twenty-six quality indicators related to 18 facets of care were incorporated into a metric providing the variable, definition of the variable, and quality parameter. A score of 1 point was assigned if the quality parameter met the threshold for appropriate performance or if the parameter was not applicable, creating a total score of up to 26 points. The predictive validity of the classification scheme was tested by using the bootstrap method. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 50 patients with ICH died during hospitalization (28%). The intensity of care quality metric score ranged from 17 points to 26 points. The mean score was higher in those who survived compared with those who died (23 ± 3 vs 21 ± 2; P = .02). Survival increased with tertile based on higher scores (100%, 67%, and 55%; P = .017). The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated a high discriminating ability of intensity of care quality metrics for in-hospital mortality (0.730, 95% confidence interval, 0.591-0.869) and a C-statistic of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Correlation of the new ICH-specific intensity of care quality metric with in-hospital mortality supports its broader use for improving and standardizing medical care among patients with ICH.
BACKGROUND: Given the considerable variation in care of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) among centers that results in differences in outcome among these patients, a new intensity of care quality metrics has been proposed. This study aimed to validate the new ICH-specific intensity of care quality metrics. METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients with ICH who were admitted within 24 hours of symptom onset were identified. Twenty-six quality indicators related to 18 facets of care were incorporated into a metric providing the variable, definition of the variable, and quality parameter. A score of 1 point was assigned if the quality parameter met the threshold for appropriate performance or if the parameter was not applicable, creating a total score of up to 26 points. The predictive validity of the classification scheme was tested by using the bootstrap method. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 50 patients with ICH died during hospitalization (28%). The intensity of care quality metric score ranged from 17 points to 26 points. The mean score was higher in those who survived compared with those who died (23 ± 3 vs 21 ± 2; P = .02). Survival increased with tertile based on higher scores (100%, 67%, and 55%; P = .017). The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated a high discriminating ability of intensity of care quality metrics for in-hospital mortality (0.730, 95% confidence interval, 0.591-0.869) and a C-statistic of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Correlation of the new ICH-specific intensity of care quality metric with in-hospital mortality supports its broader use for improving and standardizing medical care among patients with ICH.
Authors: Adnan I Qureshi; Yuko Y Palesch; Lydia D Foster; William G Barsan; Joshua N Goldstein; Daniel F Hanley; Chung Y Hsu; Claudia S Moy; Mushtaq H Qureshi; Robert Silbergleit; Jose I Suarez; Kazunori Toyoda; Haruko Yamamoto Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Wendy C Ziai; Aazim A Siddiqui; Natalie Ullman; Daniel B Herrick; Gayane Yenokyan; Nichol McBee; Karen Lane; Daniel F Hanley Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Joseph D Burns; Deborah M Green; Helena Lau; Michael Winter; Feliks Koyfman; Christina M DeFusco; James W Holsapple; Carlos S Kase Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Humaira Sadaf; Virendra R Desai; Vivek Misra; Eugene Golanov; Muralidhar L Hegde; Sonia Villapol; Christof Karmonik; Angelique Regnier-Golanov; Dimitri Sayenko; Philip J Horner; Robert Krencik; Yi Lan Weng; Farhaan S Vahidy; Gavin W Britz Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 4.511