Literature DB >> 22632665

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment planning of invasive cancer of the cervix.

Cary Lynn Siegel1, Rochelle F Andreotti, Higinia Rosa Cardenes, Douglas L Brown, David K Gaffney, Neil S Horowitz, Marcia C Javitt, Susanna I Lee, Donald G Mitchell, David H Moore, Gautam G Rao, Henry D Royal, William Small, Mahesh A Varia, Catheryn M Yashar.   

Abstract

The prognosis of cervical cancer is linked to lymph node involvement, and this is predicted clinically and pathologically by the stage of the disease, as well as the volume and grade of the tumor. Staging of cervical cancer based on International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging uses physical examination, cystoscopy, proctoscopy, intravenous urography, and barium enema. It does not include CT or MRI. Evaluation of the parametrium is limited in FIGO staging, and lymph node metastasis, an important prognostic factor, is not included in FIGO staging. The most important role for imaging is to distinguish stages Ia, Ib, and IIa disease treated with surgery from advanced disease treated with radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. This article reviews the current role of imaging in pretreatment planning of invasive cervical cancer. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22632665     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  8 in total

1.  Surgical management of early cervical cancer: the shape of future studies.

Authors:  Stefano Greggi; Cono Scaffa
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  PET-detected asymptomatic recurrence is associated with improved survival in recurrent cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jocelyn S Chapman; I-Chow Hsu; Pamela N Peters; William E Pierson; Lee-May Chen; Antonio C Westphalen
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-08

3.  Imaging across the life span: innovations in imaging and therapy for gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Meng Xu-Welliver; William T C Yuh; Julia R Fielding; Katarzyna J Macura; Zhibin Huang; Ahmet S Ayan; Floor J Backes; Guang Jia; Mariam Moshiri; Jun Zhang; Nina A Mayr
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  [18F]-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-glucose-PET Assessment of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Chitra Viswanathan; Silvana Faria; Catherine Devine; Madhavi Patnana; Tara Sagebiel; Revathy B Iyer; Priya R Bhosale
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-02-03

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berek; Koji Matsuo; Brendan H Grubbs; David K Gaffney; Susanna I Lee; Aoife Kilcoyne; Gi Jeong Cheon; Chong Woo Yoo; Lu Li; Yifeng Shao; Tianhui Chen; Miseon Kim; Mikio Mikami
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 6.  [Uterine Cervical Cancer: Emphasis on Revised FIGO Staging 2018 and MRI].

Authors:  Weon Jang; Ji Soo Song
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-09-27

Review 7.  The Complementary Role of Imaging and Tumor Biomarkerszzm321990in Gynecological Cancers: An Update of the Literature

Authors:  Emanuela Anastasi; Silvia Gigli; Laura Ballesio; Antonio Angeloni; Lucia Manganaro
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26

8.  Current management of cervical cancer in Poland-Analysis of the questionnaire trial for the years 2002-2014 in relation to ASCO 2016 recommendations.

Authors:  Tomasz Basta; Paweł Knapp; Paweł Blecharz; Lubomir Bodnar; Iwona Gawron; Dorota Babczyk; Magdalena Piróg; Tomasz Kluz; Anna Markowska; Anna Horbaczewska; Robert Jach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.