Literature DB >> 22632545

Sources of weaning advice, comparisons between formal and informal advice, and associations with weaning timing in a survey of UK first-time mothers.

Amanda P Moore1, Peter Milligan, Carol Rivas, Louise M Goff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to explore knowledge of the UK weaning guidelines and the sources of weaning advice used by UK first-time mothers.
DESIGN: An online survey of UK parents; analysed using mixed methods.
SETTING: Participants were recruited from a selection of parenting websites that hosted a link to the survey.
SUBJECTS: In total, 1348 UK first-time mothers were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: Knowledge of the guidelines was high (86 %) and associated with later weaning (P < 0·001), although 43 % of this sample weaned before 24 weeks. The majority of parents used multiple sources of information, the most influential being the health visitor (26 %), the Internet (25 %) and books (18 %). Fifty-six per cent said they received conflicting advice. Younger mothers and those of lower educational attainment were more likely to be influenced by advice from family, which was likely to be to wean earlier. Furthermore, those most influenced by their mother/grandmother were less likely to have accurate knowledge of the guidelines. In this population the Internet was used for weaning advice across all sociodemographic groups and was associated with a later weaning age, independently of sociodemographic factors (P < 0·001). Data from responses to a free-text question are used in illustration.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that first-time mothers have a good understanding of the weaning guidelines but seek weaning information from multiple sources, much of which is conflicting. Informal sources of weaning advice appear most influential in younger mothers and those of lower educational attainment, and result in earlier weaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22632545     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980012002868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  5 in total

1.  Maternal and infant factors associated with reasons for introducing solid foods.

Authors:  Amy Brown; Hannah Rowan
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Nutrition and nurture in infancy and childhood. Abstracts of the Fourth International Interdisciplinary Conference Organized by Maternal & Infant Nutrition & Nurture Unit (MAINN), School of Health, University of Central Lancashire. June 10-12, 2013. Cumbria, United Kingdom.

Authors: 
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Assessing the Potential for Integrating Routine Data Collection on Complementary Feeding to Child Health Visits: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Louise Tully; Charlotte M Wright; Deirdre McCormick; Ada L Garcia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Education of family members to support weaning to solids and nutrition in later infancy in term-born infants.

Authors:  Shalini Ojha; Zenab Elfzzani; T'ng Chang Kwok; Jon Dorling
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-25

5.  Complementary feeding: Should baby be leading the way?

Authors:  Simon C Langley-Evans
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 2.995

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.