OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare average acceleration capacity (AAC), a new parameter to assess the dynamic capacity of the fetal autonomous nervous system, and short term variation (STV) in fetuses affected by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and healthy fetuses. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed, including 39 women with IUGR singleton pregnancies (estimated fetal weight <10th percentile and umbilical artery resistance index >95th percentile) and 43 healthy control pregnancies matched according to gestational age at recording. Ultrasound biometries and Doppler examination were performed for identification of IUGR and control fetuses, with subsequent analysis of fetal heart rate, resulting in STV and AAC. Follow-up for IUGR and control pregnancies was done, with perinatal outcome variables recorded. RESULTS: AAC [IUGR mean value 2.0 bpm (interquartile range = 1.6-2.1), control 2.7 bpm (2.6-3.0)] differentiates better than STV [IUGR 7.4 ms (5.3-8.9), control 10.9 ms (9.2-12.7)] between IUGR and control. The area under the curve for AAC is 97 % [95% CI = (0.95-1.0)], for STV 85 % (CI = 0.76-0.93; p < 0.01). Positive predictive value for STV is 77% and negative predictive value is 81%. For AAC both positive and negative predictive values are 90%. CONCLUSIONS: AAC shows an improvement to discriminate between normal and compromised fetuses at a single moment in time, in comparison with STV.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare average acceleration capacity (AAC), a new parameter to assess the dynamic capacity of the fetal autonomous nervous system, and short term variation (STV) in fetuses affected by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and healthy fetuses. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed, including 39 women with IUGR singleton pregnancies (estimated fetal weight <10th percentile and umbilical artery resistance index >95th percentile) and 43 healthy control pregnancies matched according to gestational age at recording. Ultrasound biometries and Doppler examination were performed for identification of IUGR and control fetuses, with subsequent analysis of fetal heart rate, resulting in STV and AAC. Follow-up for IUGR and control pregnancies was done, with perinatal outcome variables recorded. RESULTS: AAC [IUGR mean value 2.0 bpm (interquartile range = 1.6-2.1), control 2.7 bpm (2.6-3.0)] differentiates better than STV [IUGR 7.4 ms (5.3-8.9), control 10.9 ms (9.2-12.7)] between IUGR and control. The area under the curve for AAC is 97 % [95% CI = (0.95-1.0)], for STV 85 % (CI = 0.76-0.93; p < 0.01). Positive predictive value for STV is 77% and negative predictive value is 81%. For AAC both positive and negative predictive values are 90%. CONCLUSIONS: AAC shows an improvement to discriminate between normal and compromised fetuses at a single moment in time, in comparison with STV.
Authors: Dirk Hoyer; Jan Żebrowski; Dirk Cysarz; Hernâni Gonçalves; Adelina Pytlik; Célia Amorim-Costa; João Bernardes; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Otto W Witte; Ekkehard Schleußner; Lisa Stroux; Christopher Redman; Antoniya Georgieva; Stephen Payne; Gari Clifford; Maria G Signorini; Giovanni Magenes; Fernando Andreotti; Hagen Malberg; Sebastian Zaunseder; Igor Lakhno; Uwe Schneider Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 2.833
Authors: Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Dirk Hoyer; Alexander Schmidt; Kathleen M Gustafson; Silvia M Lobmaier; Igor Lakhno; Peter van Leeuwen; Dirk Cysarz; Hubert Preisl; Uwe Schneider Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 2.833
Authors: Lisa Stroux; Christopher W Redman; Antoniya Georgieva; Stephen J Payne; Gari D Clifford Journal: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Marta C Antonelli; Martin G Frasch; Mercedes Rumi; Ritika Sharma; Peter Zimmermann; Maria S Molinet; Silvia M Lobmaier Journal: Curr Neuropharmacol Date: 2022 Impact factor: 7.708
Authors: Massimo W Rivolta; Tamara Stampalija; Daniela Casati; Bryan S Richardson; Michael G Ross; Martin G Frasch; Axel Bauer; Enrico Ferrazzi; Roberto Sassi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jonathan Lai; Niamh C Nowlan; Ravi Vaidyanathan; Caroline J Shaw; Christoph C Lees Journal: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Annette Wacker-Gussmann; Judith Schopen; Jana Engelhard; Christina Sitzberger; Nadine Lienert; Peter Ewert; Alexander Müller; Georg Schmidt; Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz; Silvia Maria Lobmaier Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 4.241