Literature DB >> 22630143

When and for whom do frequencies facilitate performance? On the role of numerical literacy.

W Trey Hill1, Gary L Brase.   

Abstract

The thesis that the mind is better prepared to process frequencies-as compared to other numerical formats-continues to be debated. A recent aspect of this issue is the role of numeracy (numerical literacy; one's ability to understand and work with numerical information) and specifically the argument that individual differences in numeracy interact with numerical formats. This interaction, either that frequencies improve performance only for those of low numeracy or that frequencies work only for those of high numeracy, would suggest that better performance using frequencies could be due to (nonevolutionary) numeracy effects. The three present studies revisited prior work with cumulative probability, Bayesian reasoning, and scenario risk assessments to study the effects of numeracy on frequency facilitation. Results from these experiments consistently failed to replicate previous findings of interactions; however, a more consistent finding emerged of a straightforward frequency effect. The lack of interactions and observations of frequency main effects lend support to the evolutionary explanation of the frequency effect. In addition, some possible statistical processes are proposed to explain the observation of interactions in past studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22630143     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.687004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  14 in total

1.  Another chance for good reasoning.

Authors:  Stefania Pighin; Katya Tentori; Vittorio Girotto
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

2.  Causal explanation improves judgment under uncertainty, but rarely in a Bayesian way.

Authors:  Brett K Hayes; Jeremy Ngo; Guy E Hawkins; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

3.  Communicating risk in prenatal screening: the consequences of Bayesian misapprehension.

Authors:  Gorka Navarrete; Rut Correia; Dan Froimovitch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 4.  Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why.

Authors:  Gary L Brase; W Trey Hill
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-31

5.  Beyond the status-quo: research on Bayesian reasoning must develop in both theory and method.

Authors:  Simon J McNair
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-06

6.  Do Different Mental Models Influence Cybersecurity Behavior? Evaluations via Statistical Reasoning Performance.

Authors:  Gary L Brase; Eugene Y Vasserman; William Hsu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-02

7.  Toward an ecological analysis of Bayesian inferences: how task characteristics influence responses.

Authors:  Sebastian Hafenbrädl; Ulrich Hoffrage
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-04

8.  Natural frequencies improve Bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoffrage; Stefan Krauss; Laura Martignon; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-14

9.  Natural frequencies facilitate diagnostic inferences of managers.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoffrage; Sebastian Hafenbrädl; Cyril Bouquet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-22

Review 10.  Comprehension and computation in Bayesian problem solving.

Authors:  Eric D Johnson; Elisabet Tubau
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.