| Literature DB >> 22629169 |
Eduardo J León Ruiz1, Herminia García Mozo, Eugenio Domínguez Vilches, Carmen Galán.
Abstract
Traditionally phenology studies have been focused on changes through time, but there exist many instances in ecological research where it is necessary to interpolate among spatially stratified samples. The combined use of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Geostatistics can be an essential tool for spatial analysis in phenological studies. Geostatistics are a family of statistics that describe correlations through space/time and they can be used for both quantifying spatial correlation and interpolating unsampled points. In the present work, estimations based upon Geostatistics and GIS mapping have enabled the construction of spatial models that reflect phenological evolution of Vulpia geniculata (L.) Link throughout the study area during sampling season. Ten sampling points, scattered throughout the city and low mountains in the "Sierra de Córdoba" were chosen to carry out the weekly phenological monitoring during flowering season. The phenological data were interpolated by applying the traditional geostatitical method of Kriging, which was used to elaborate weekly estimations of V. geniculata phenology in unsampled areas. Finally, the application of Geostatistics and GIS to create phenological maps could be an essential complement in pollen aerobiological studies, given the increased interest in obtaining automatic aerobiological forecasting maps.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22629169 PMCID: PMC3353554 DOI: 10.1100/2012/624247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Sampling points distribution.
Sampling points coordinates.
| Sampling point | Altitude |
|
| Bioclimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sotos de la Albolafia | 92 | 343274 | 4193395 | Termomediterranean |
| Arroyo de Rabanales | 109 | 357483 | 4196492 | Termomediterranean |
| Barrio Naranjo | 146 | 344300 | 4196752 | Termomediterranean |
| Asland | 184 | 345252 | 4198511 | Termomediterranean |
| Alger | 217 | 344926 | 4199407 | Termomediterranean |
| La Palomera | 251 | 342737 | 4198985 | Mesomediterranean |
| Santo Domingo | 368 | 341758 | 4200722 | Mesomediterranean |
| Cuesta del 14% | 511 | 341181 | 4201771 | Mesomediterranean |
| La Conejera | 555 | 340584 | 4201852 | Mesomediterranean |
| Los Villares | 585 | 341149 | 4203129 | Mesomediterranean |
Figure 2Poaceae airborne pollen cumulated per week during the study years.
Results of Descriptive Analysis. Year 2004.
| 2004 | 23 Apr | 30 Apr | 07 May | 14 May | 21 May | 28 May |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.04 | 1.54 | 2.11 | 2.54 | 3.04 | 3.68 |
| Variance | 0.32 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.31 |
| Minimum | 0.00 | 0.50 | 1.25 | 1.75 | 2.25 | 2.75 |
| Maximum | 1.75 | 2.25 | 2.75 | 3.00 | 3.50 | 4.00 |
|
| 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Upper threshold | 2.74 | 3.44 | 3.83 | 4.00 | 4.56 | 5.34 |
| Lower threshold | −0.67 | −0.37 | 0.38 | 1.07 | 1.51 | 2.02 |
Results of Descriptive Analysis. Year 2005.
| 2005 | 22 Apr | 29 Apr | 06 May | 13 May | 20 May |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 0.42 | 1.18 | 2.11 | 2.82 | 3.25 |
| Variance | 0.14 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.20 |
| Minimum | 0.00 | 0.50 | 1.50 | 2.25 | 2.75 |
| Maximum | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.50 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
|
| 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Upper threshold | 1.55 | 2.72 | 4.18 | 4.74 | 4.59 |
| Lower treshold | −0.71 | −0.37 | 0.04 | 0.90 | 1.91 |
Results of Descriptive Analysis. Year 2006.
| 2006 | 13 Apr | 20 Apr | 27 Apr | 04 May | 11 May | 18 May | 25 May |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 0.64 | 1.14 | 1.57 | 2.18 | 2.61 | 3.18 | 3.79 |
| Variance | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.15 |
| Minimum | 0.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 3.00 |
| Maximum | 1.25 | 2.00 | 2.25 | 2.75 | 3.25 | 3.75 | 4.00 |
|
| 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Upper threshold | 1.78 | 2.43 | 2.77 | 3.38 | 3.82 | 4.53 | 4.97 |
| Lower treshold | −0.49 | −0.15 | 0.37 | 0.98 | 1.39 | 1.83 | 2.61 |
Figure 3Cross-validation analyses (variograms) obtained for year 2004.
Figure 4Cross-validation analyses (variograms) obtained for year 2005.
Figure 5Cross-validation analyses (variograms) obtained for year 2006.
Cross-validation summary results.
| 2004 | 23/04/04 | 30/04/04 | 07/05/04 | 14/05/04 | 21/05/04 | 28/05/04 | |
| Regression coefficient | 0.93 | 1.14 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.99 | 0.78 | |
|
| |||||||
| 2005 | 22/04/05 | 29/04/05 | 06/05/05 | 13/05/05 | 20/0505 | ||
| Regression coefficient | 0.73 | 0.99 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.47 | ||
|
| |||||||
| 2006 | 13/04/06 | 20/04/06 | 27/04/06 | 04/05/06 | 11/05/06 | 18/05/06 | 25/05/06 |
| Regression coefficient | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 1.12 |
Figure 6Phenological maps. Year 2004.
Figure 7Phenological maps. Year 2005.
Figure 8Phenological maps. Year 2006.