| Literature DB >> 22629152 |
N Sabel1, A Robertson, S Nietzsche, J G Norén.
Abstract
Enamel structure is of importance in demineralization. Differences in porosity in enamel effect the rate of demineralization, seen between perEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22629152 PMCID: PMC3354421 DOI: 10.1100/2012/587254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Schematic view of a specimen; the darker area shows the lesion and the white area indicate Sound enamel. Circles of the areas where measurements of XRMA were performed and the parallel vertical lines represent line scans of XRMA.
Mean of depth of lesions (in micrometer) in all specimens, measured in polarized light microscope (POLMI), microradiographs (MRG), SEM, and XRMA images. Appearance of lesions; chalky and rough surface, chalky and smooth surface, and normal color with a smooth surface. Age of the individuals in years when tooth was extracted.
| Depth in mm | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLMI | MRG | SEM | XRMA | Appearance | Age | |
| 1 | 74 | 71 | 57 | Chalky and rough | 13 | |
| 2 | 110 | 46 | 58 | 48 | Normal and smooth | 13 |
| 3 | 87 | 82 | 83 | Chalky and rough | 5 | |
| 4 | 112 | 49 | 47 | 70 | Chalky and smooth | 5 |
| 5 | 91 | 40 | 89 | Chalky and rough | 5 | |
| 6 | 66 | 44 | 78 | 71 | Chalky and rough | 8 |
| 7 | 57 | 54 | 70 | 75 | Chalky and rough | 6 |
| 8 | 94 | 53 | 51 | 73 | Normal and smooth | 5 |
| 9 | 99 | 99 | 130 | 112 | Chalky and rough | 7 |
| 10 | 56 | 43 | 70 | Chalky and smooth | 7 | |
| 11 | 38 | 25 | 31 | 40 | Normal and smooth | 13 |
| 12 | 74 | 72 | 110 | Chalky and rough | 17 | |
| 13 | 87 | 37 | 66 | Chalky and smooth | 6 | |
| 15 | 68 | 59 | 85 | Chalky and smooth | 6 | |
| 16 | 77 | 38 | 46 | 63 | Chalky and rough | 3 |
| 17 | 81 | 73 | 115 | Chalky and rough | 6 | |
| 18 | 109 | 75 | 52 | Chalky and smooth | 15 | |
Figure 2POLMI image, at 4x. The lesion is seen as a uniform demineralized zone, with a positive birefringent bulk below a negatively birefringent surface layer. At the lesion front, a zone with a higher degree of demineralization is seen.
Figure 3SEM image at 75x. The lesion appears as a well-defined area with distinct borders both in depth and width. Here is the lesion of lighter colour and having less structure compared to the sound enamel.
Figure 4Image from a microradiography and graph of grayvalue. related to the image. Dotted line through the lesion and full line through the sound enamel.
Figure 5Graph of the mean values and standard deviations of wt% calcium in XRMA (linescans) in sound enamel and in lesion from the enamel surface till approximately 250 μm in the enamel.
Mean wt% of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorous, and calcium in sound enamel and lesion.
| Chemical content in normal enamel and in lesion (weight%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon | Nitrogen | Oxygen | Phosphorous | Calcium | ||||||
| Sound | Lesion | Sound | Lesion | Sound | Lesion | Sound | Lesion | Sound | Lesion | |
| Mean | 6.21 | 23.33 | 2.04 | 5.49 | 41.02 | 40.72 | 15.90 | 11.34 | 34.82 | 19.13 |
| Median | 5.68 | 18.74 | 1.74 | 5.45 | 39.58 | 40.90 | 15.54 | 11.16 | 30.06 | 18.84 |
| STD | 2.13 | 11.95 | 1.02 | 1.67 | 3.68 | 6.30 | 1.30 | 01.30 | 4.18 | 7.97 |
Figure 6Plot of the wt% of carbon related to depth of lesion. Circle marks the specimen with wt% of carbon >7%. which also have deeper lesion.
Figure 7Knowledge tree generated in XpertRule Miner. At the top of the tree is the attribute “Age” located with the break points for the two end leaves with the group names, frequency within each group and percentage correctly classified examples. The last row shows the total frequency of examples and the overall correctly classified examples.