Literature DB >> 2262893

Interactions between scopolamine and muscarinic cholinergic agonists or cholinesterase inhibitors on spatial alternation performance in rats.

H E Shannon1, K G Bemis, J C Hendrix, J S Ward.   

Abstract

The effects on working memory of the muscarinic cholinergic agonists oxotremorine, arecoline, RS86 and pilocarpine, and the cholinesterase inhibitors physostigmine and tetrahydroaminoacadine were investigated in male F344 rats. Working memory was assessed by behavior maintained under a spatial alternation schedule of food presentation in which the interval between trials was varied from 2 to 32 sec. Under control conditions the percentage of correct responses decreased as the retention interval was varied from 2 to 32 sec. Administered alone the cholinergic agonists oxotremorine (0.01-0.1 mg/kg), arecoline (3-30 mg/kg), RS86 (0.3-3 mg/kg) and pilocarpine (0.3-3.0 mg/kg), and the cholinesterase inhibitors physostigmine (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) and tetrahydroaminoacridine (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) either had no effect on or produced dose-related deficits in working memory and decreases in response rates. The muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (0.1 mg/kg) produced retention interval-dependent decreases in the percentage of correct responding and rates of responding. The cholinergic agonists and tetrahydroaminoacridine failed to reverse the effects of scopolamine. However, physostigmine produced a dose-dependent reversal of the working-memory deficits and response-rate decreasing effects of scopolamine. The present results are consistent with the interpretation that drugs which primarily enhance M2 muscarinic cholinergic transmission are ineffective in enhancing working memory or in reversing scopolamine-induced deficits in working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2262893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  8 in total

1.  Temporal and region-dependent changes in muscarinic M4 receptors in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex of adrenalectomized rats.

Authors:  Ezra Mulugeta; Irwin Chandranath; Evert Karlsson; Bengt Winblad; Abdu Adem
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Attenuation of scopolamine-induced spatial memory deficits in the rat by cholinomimetic and non-cholinomimetic drugs using a novel task in the 12-arm radial maze.

Authors:  R P Dennes; J C Barnes
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Novel alkoxy-oxazolyl-tetrahydropyridine muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonists.

Authors:  H E Shannon; F P Bymaster; J C Hendrix; S J Quimby; C H Mitch
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Increasing hippocampal acetylcholine levels enhance behavioral performance in an animal model of diencephalic amnesia.

Authors:  Jessica J Roland; Katherine Mark; Ryan P Vetreno; Lisa M Savage
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Scopolamine impairs delayed matching in an olfactory task in rats.

Authors:  N Ravel; M Vigouroux; A Elaagouby; R Gervais
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Attenuation of muscarinic receptor blockade-induced impairment of spatial delayed alternation performance by the triazole MDL 26,479.

Authors:  L A Holley; P Dudchenko; M Sarter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Tacrine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  A J Wagstaff; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Intrahippocampal blockade of nicotinic or muscarinic receptors fails to impair nonnavigational spatial memory in macaques.

Authors:  Elyssa M LaFlamme; Ludise Malkova; Patrick A Forcelli
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.154

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.