Literature DB >> 22628627

Science funding. NSF's 'Big Pitch' tests anonymized grant reviews.

Yudhijit Bhattacharjee.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22628627     DOI： 10.1126/science.336.6084.969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Are race, ethnicity, and medical school affiliation associated with NIH R01 type 1 award probability for physician investigators?

Authors:  Donna K Ginther; Laurel L Haak; Walter T Schaffer; Raynard Kington
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 2.  The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Sayaka Sato; Pascal Mark Gygax; Julian Randall; Marianne Schmid Mast
Journal:  High Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2020-10-03

3.  Grant application review: the case of transparency.

Authors:  David Gurwitz; Elena Milanesi; Thomas Koenig
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 4.  What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

Authors:  Susan Guthrie; Ioana Ghiga; Steven Wooding
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-08-07

5.  What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis.

Authors:  Alejandra Recio-Saucedo; Ksenia Crane; Katie Meadmore; Kathryn Fackrell; Hazel Church; Simon Fraser; Amanda Blatch-Jones
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2022-03-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.