Literature DB >> 22628590

Resurfacing arthroplasty for hip dysplasia: a prospective randomised study.

Q Wang1, X L Zhang, Y S Chen, H Shen, J J Shao.   

Abstract

In this prospective study a total of 80 consecutive Chinese patients with Crowe type I or II developmental dysplasia of the hip were randomly assigned for hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) or total hip replacement (THR). Three patients assigned to HRA were converted to THR, and three HRA patients and two THR patients were lost to follow-up. This left a total of 34 patients (37 hips) who underwent HRA and 38 (39 hips) who underwent THR. The mean follow-up was 59.4 months (52 to 70) in the HRA group and 60.6 months (50 to 72) in the THR group. There was no failure of the prosthesis in either group. Flexion of the hip was significantly better after HRA, but there was no difference in the mean post-operative Harris hip scores between the groups. The mean size of the acetabular component in the HRA group was significantly larger than in the THR group (49.5 mm vs 46.1 mm, p = 0.001). There was no difference in the mean abduction angle of the acetabular component between the two groups. Although the patients in this series had risk factors for failure after HRA, such as low body weight, small femoral heads and dysplasia, the clinical results of resurfacing in those with Crowe type I or II hip dysplasia were satisfactory. Patients in the HRA group had a better range of movement, although neck-cup impingement was observed. However, more acetabular bone was sacrificed in HRA patients, and it is unclear whether this will have an adverse effect in the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22628590     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.28522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Hip resurfacing: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Régis Pailhé; Akash Sharma; Nicolas Reina; Etienne Cavaignac; Philippe Chiron; Jean-Michel Laffosse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The ratio of femoral head diameter to pelvic height in the normal hips of a Chinese population.

Authors:  Yanbo Zhang; Jinlan Jiang; Chenyu Wang; Jianlin Zuo; Modi Yang; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-27

3.  The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men.

Authors:  Kimona Issa; Amanda Palich; Tiffany Tatevossian; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Qais Naziri; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The truths we seek and the randomised trial in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Mid-term results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for treatment of osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip: a minimum of 8-years of follow-up.

Authors:  Yuxing Qu; Tao Jiang; Hong Zhao; Yi Gao; Chong Zheng; Jianda Xu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-11-20

6.  Comparison of hip function and quality of life of total hip arthroplasty and resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint at 5 years.

Authors:  Matthew L Costa; Juul Achten; Pedro Foguet; Nicholas R Parsons
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Increased Mortality in Metal-on-Metal versus Non-Metal-on-Metal Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty at 10 Years and Longer Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  B G Pijls; J M T A Meessen; J W Schoones; M Fiocco; H J L van der Heide; A Sedrakyan; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.