Literature DB >> 22628454

Potential molecular tools for assessing the public health risk associated with waterborne Cryptosporidium oocysts.

Rajendra J Kothavade1.   

Abstract

The use of multiple barrier stages at water and wastewater treatment facilities allows for the effective removal of the vast majority of coliforms and other enteric and non-enteric microbes. Subsequent disinfection steps (chlorine, ozone and UV irradiation) are utilized to inactivate microbes that escape the preceding treatment stages. Most viruses, bacteria and protozoa, such as Giardia, are effectively inactivated by chlorination; however, Cryptosporidium is relatively more resistant to environmental conditions and to chlorination. Therefore, UV disinfection has been introduced at many water and wastewater treatment plants to increase log inactivation. Any accidental treatment failure may pose a significant risk to public health. Waterborne transmission of coccidian parasites such as Cryptosporidium and Giardia continues to be a major public health concern. No effective therapies currently exist to treat cryptosporidiosis and the global increase in immunocompromised populations has emphasized the need for water utilities and public health laboratories to have immediate and reliable access to highly sensitive test methods that can determine the host specificity, viability and infectivity of protozoa in the water supply. The most common method used for monitoring Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts at intermediate treatment stages and in finished drinking water is the US EPA Method 1623. Although Cryptosporidium species are morphologically indistinguishable, they differ greatly in their host specificity and infectivity. Method 1623 provides quantitative information about Cryptosporidium and Giardia contamination but cannot distinguish between species for intervention purposes in outbreak situations, nor is this method reliable for determining whether the oocyst on the slide is infective for humans. Molecular methods have proven valuable in diagnosing infectious diseases, especially those for which the causative agent is difficult to grow in culture, and similar tools would aid public health agencies to determine risk associated with Cryptosporidium. This review focuses on current methods for determining the host specificity (genotyping), viability and infectivity of Cryptosporidium oocysts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22628454     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.043158-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  7 in total

1.  Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. removal efficiency of a combined fixed-film system treating domestic wastewater receiving hospital effluent.

Authors:  Sandra Yamashiro; Mário Luiz Rodrigues Foco; Carolina Ortiz Pineda; Juliana José; Edson Aparecido Abdul Nour; Isabel Cristina Vidal Siqueira-Castro; Regina Maura Bueno Franco
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Development and Evaluation of Three Real-Time PCR Assays for Genotyping and Source Tracking Cryptosporidium spp. in Water.

Authors:  Na Li; Norman F Neumann; Norma Ruecker; Kerri A Alderisio; Gregory D Sturbaum; Eric N Villegas; Rachel Chalmers; Paul Monis; Yaoyu Feng; Lihua Xiao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Integrated cryptosporidium assay to determine oocyst density, infectivity, and genotype for risk assessment of source and reuse water.

Authors:  Brendon King; Stella Fanok; Renae Phillips; Brooke Swaffer; Paul Monis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Alternative indicators for monitoring Cryptosporidium oocysts in reclaimed water.

Authors:  M Agulló-Barceló; F Oliva; F Lucena
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Human infective potential of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in urban wastewater treatment plant effluents.

Authors:  Jiawen Ma; Yaoyu Feng; Yue Hu; Eric N Villegas; Lihua Xiao
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 6.  Detection of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. in Environmental Water Samples: A Journey into the Past and New Perspectives.

Authors:  Marie-Stéphanie Fradette; Alexander I Culley; Steve J Charette
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-07

7.  Therapeutic effects of acetylspiramycin and garlicin on cryptosporidiosis among drug users.

Authors:  Min-Zhu Huang; Jin Li; Lan Guan; Deng-Qing Li; Xin-Min Nie; Rong Gui; Xia Chen
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.077

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.