Literature DB >> 22628068

Design of psychosocial factors questionnaires: a systematic measurement approach.

Gloria H Villalobos1, Angélica M Vargas, Martin A Rondón, Sarah A Felknor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of psychosocial factors requires instruments that measure dynamic complexities. This study explains the design of a set of questionnaires to evaluate work and non-work psychosocial risk factors for stress-related illnesses.
METHODS: The measurement model was based on a review of literature. Content validity was performed by experts and cognitive interviews. Pilot testing was carried out with a convenience sample of 132 workers. Cronbach's alpha evaluated internal consistency and concurrent validity was estimated by Spearman correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: Three questionnaires were constructed to evaluate exposure to work and non-work risk factors. Content validity improved the questionnaires coherence with the measurement model. Internal consistency was adequate (α = 0.85-0.95). Concurrent validity resulted in moderate correlations of psychosocial factors with stress symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Questionnaires' content reflected a wide spectrum of psychosocial factors sources. Cognitive interviews improved understanding of questions and dimensions. The structure of the measurement model was confirmed.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22628068      PMCID: PMC3521865          DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  13 in total

1.  Psychosocial factors and the disorders of GI function: what is the link?

Authors:  Douglas A Drossman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Time management training and perceived control of time at work.

Authors:  Alexander Häfner; Armin Stock
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

3.  The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire--a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment.

Authors:  Tage S Kristensen; Harald Hannerz; Annie Høgh; Vilhelm Borg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.

Authors:  J E Ware; B Gandek
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Dialectic between conceptual and causal inquiry in psychosocial work-environment research.

Authors:  J V Johnson; E M Hall
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1996-10

Review 6.  Workplace interventions to prevent musculoskeletal and visual symptoms and disorders among computer users: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shelley Brewer; Dwayne Van Eerd; Benjamin C Amick; Emma Irvin; Kent M Daum; Fred Gerr; J Steven Moore; Kim Cullen; David Rempel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

Review 7.  Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.

Authors:  J Siegrist
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1996-01

8.  Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men.

Authors:  R Karasek; D Baker; F Marxer; A Ahlbom; T Theorell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.

Authors:  R Karasek; C Brisson; N Kawakami; I Houtman; P Bongers; B Amick
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1998-10

10.  Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II Study.

Authors:  S A Stansfeld; R Fuhrer; M J Shipley; M G Marmot
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.