Literature DB >> 22627948

Network meta-analysis of prasugrel, ticagrelor, high- and standard-dose clopidogrel in patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Sabine Steiner1, Deddo Moertl, Li Chen, Doug Coyle, George A Wells.   

Abstract

Since novel antiplatelet treatments (prasugrel, ticagrelor, high-dose clopidogrel) have been predominantly tested against standard-dose clopidogrel, data on direct comparisons between these therapies are scarce. We therefore indirectly compared their efficacy and safety in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Electronic databases were searched systematically to identify head-to-head randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Network meta-analysis was performed using generalised linear mixed models with adjustment for length of follow-up. Findings were corroborated by mixed treatment comparison through Bayesian methods. Fourteen RCTs were identified and included in the analysis (high- vs. standard-dose clopidogrel: 9 trials, prasugrel vs. high-dose clopidogrel: 2 trials, prasugrel vs. standard-dose clopidogrel: 2 trials, ticagrelor vs. standard-dose clopidogrel: 1 trial). No significant differences were found for efficacy outcomes except for stent thrombosis favouring prasugrel (vs. ticagrelor: odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 0.94; vs. high-dose clopidogrel: OR 0.70, 95%CI: 0.48, 1.01). Prasugrel exhibited a similar bleeding risk as high-dose clopidogrel, but more major (OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.07, 1.90) and major or minor bleeding (OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.09, 1.69) compared to ticagrelor. Ticagrelor was also associated with less major or minor bleeding compared to high-dose clopidogrel (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.69, 0.96). No differences were seen for non CABG-related major bleeding between the three strategies. Results were corroborated in a subgroup analysis comprising only patients with acute coronary syndromes. In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials, network meta-analysis suggests potentially relevant differences in efficacy and bleeding risk among novel antiplatelet treatments and may thereby advance understanding of their differential therapeutic properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22627948     DOI: 10.1160/TH11-08-0586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  9 in total

Review 1.  Antithrombotic agents for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Vic Hasselblad; Matthew T Roe; Deepak L Bhatt; Stefan K James; Ph Gabriel Steg; C Michael Gibson; E Magnus Ohman
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Older Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Izza Shahid; Muhammad Abdullah Nizam; Vanita Motiani; Ritesh G Menezes; Unaiza Naeem; Tariq Jamal Siddiqi; Tehlil Rizwan; Fahd Makhdom; Pradhum Ram; Muhammad Shariq Usman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Advances in antiplatelet technologies to improve cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: a review of ticagrelor.

Authors:  Estella M Davis; Jon T Knezevich; Robyn M Teply
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04-19

Review 4.  Should dual antiplatelet therapy be used in patients following coronary artery bypass surgery? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Subodh Verma; Shaun G Goodman; Shamir R Mehta; David A Latter; Marc Ruel; Milan Gupta; Bobby Yanagawa; Mohammed Al-Omran; Nandini Gupta; Hwee Teoh; Jan O Friedrich
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Avik Ray; Ahmad Najmi; Gaurav Khandelwal; Ratinder Jhaj; Balakrishnan Sadasivam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 6.  High-maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Yachen Zhang; Yong Tang; Xiaohong Huang; Yuquan Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Choice of antithrombotics in acute coronary syndrome - A balance of efficacy versus safety.

Authors:  Upendra Kaul; Jagdish C Mohan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-02-28

8.  "Real-World" Comparison of Prasugrel With Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.

Authors:  Cynthia Larmore; Mark B Effron; Cliff Molife; Mitch DeKoven; Yajun Zhu; Jingsong Lu; Swapna Karkare; Hsiao D Lieu; Won Chan Lee; George W Vetrovec
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Comparison of Clopidogrel With Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Clinical Outcomes From the National Cardiovascular Database ACTION Registry.

Authors:  Mohamed Khayata; Joseph N Gabra; M Farhan Nasser; George I Litman; Shyam Bhakta; Rupesh Raina
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2017-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.