BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CMBs have become increasingly recognized with the widespread use of MR imaging techniques that are sensitive to iron deposits. The purpose of this study was to correlate the presence of CMBs and carotid plaque characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients (47 men; 23 women; mean age, 65 years) were prospectively analyzed. Carotid arteries were studied using a 16-detector row CT scanner, whereas the brain was explored with an MR imaging 1.5T system. CMBs were studied using a T2*-weighted GRE sequence. CMBs were classified by an ordinal scale and carotid plaques were characterized based on their composition as fatty, mixed, or calcified. Patients were classified as symptomatic and asymptomatic. Chi-square and multiple logistic regression analyses, as well as ROCs, were calculated. RESULTS: The prevalence of CMBs was 30%. A statistically significant difference in CMB prevalence was observed between symptomatic (46%) and asymptomatic (19%) patients (P value = .0021; OR = 3.7). Correlation analysis demonstrated an association between the number of CMBs and the symptoms (P = .0001). A statistically significant association was observed between the presence of fatty plaque and CMBs (P = .0019). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest an association between the presence of carotid artery fatty plaque, symptoms, and CMBs. Moreover, we found that the presence (and entity) of CMBs may represent an indicator of cerebrovascular symptom severity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:CMBs have become increasingly recognized with the widespread use of MR imaging techniques that are sensitive to iron deposits. The purpose of this study was to correlate the presence of CMBs and carotid plaque characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients (47 men; 23 women; mean age, 65 years) were prospectively analyzed. Carotid arteries were studied using a 16-detector row CT scanner, whereas the brain was explored with an MR imaging 1.5T system. CMBs were studied using a T2*-weighted GRE sequence. CMBs were classified by an ordinal scale and carotid plaques were characterized based on their composition as fatty, mixed, or calcified. Patients were classified as symptomatic and asymptomatic. Chi-square and multiple logistic regression analyses, as well as ROCs, were calculated. RESULTS: The prevalence of CMBs was 30%. A statistically significant difference in CMB prevalence was observed between symptomatic (46%) and asymptomatic (19%) patients (P value = .0021; OR = 3.7). Correlation analysis demonstrated an association between the number of CMBs and the symptoms (P = .0001). A statistically significant association was observed between the presence of fatty plaque and CMBs (P = .0019). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest an association between the presence of carotid artery fatty plaque, symptoms, and CMBs. Moreover, we found that the presence (and entity) of CMBs may represent an indicator of cerebrovascular symptom severity.
Authors: Daniel Bos; M Arfan Ikram; Suzette E Elias-Smale; Gabriel P Krestin; Albert Hofman; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Aad van der Lugt; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Thomas T de Weert; Mohamed Ouhlous; Pieter E Zondervan; Johanna M Hendriks; Diederik W J Dippel; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Aad van der Lugt Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-04-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Julie Staals; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Iris L H Knottnerus; Rob P W Rouhl; Léon H G Henskens; Jan Lodder Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mariëlle M F Poels; M Arfan Ikram; Aad van der Lugt; Albert Hofman; Gabriel P Krestin; Monique M B Breteler; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M W Vernooij; A van der Lugt; M A Ikram; P A Wielopolski; W J Niessen; A Hofman; G P Krestin; M M B Breteler Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Rozie; T T de Weert; C de Monyé; P J Homburg; H L J Tanghe; D W J Dippel; A van der Lugt Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park; Soon Ho Yoon; Eui Jin Hwang; Jong Hyuk Lee; Su Yeon Ahn; Jin Mo Goo Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: José R Romero; Sarah R Preis; Alexa Beiser; Charles DeCarli; Ralph B D'Agostino; Philip A Wolf; Ramachandran S Vasan; Joseph F Polak; Sudha Seshadri Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 5.501