Literature DB >> 22627433

Comparison of the effect of 2 hypotensive anesthetic techniques on early recovery complications after orthognathic surgery.

Reza Tabrizi1, Hamid Reza Eftekharian, Nicole Janine Langner, Birkan Taha Ozkan.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the recovery complications following the use of 2 anesthetic protocols in orthognathic surgery, namely, propofol with remifentanil and isoflurane with remifentanil. Sixty-two patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I were selected. All underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Propofol with remifentanil was used as an anesthesia in group 1 (n = 32), and isoflurane with remifentanil was used in the patients in group 2 (n = 30). Early recovery complications consisting of pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), shivering, and agitation were evaluated and documented. The length of the operation and duration of recovery were documented for all patients. Analysis of the data demonstrated no relationship between age and recovery time (P > 0.05). Analysis of data with χ(2) and independent t-tests did not show any difference between the 2 groups with regard to pain, agitation, PONV, and shivering (P > 0.05). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of the operation time on recovery complications. The analysis showed that pain and PONV were significantly higher in those who experienced a longer operation time. With increasing operation time longer than 165 minutes, 64% of patients experienced pain, and 89% of them had PONV. General anesthesia can be provided via intravenously administered medications and/or inhaled volatile anesthetics. No significant difference in early recovery time was found in patients when either isoflurane or propofol was used to maintain the anesthesia. However, the length of the operation played a major role in increasing early recovery complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22627433     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824de3d3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  5 in total

1.  Multimodal protocol reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy.

Authors:  Carolyn Dicus Brookes; John Berry; Josiah Rich; Brent A Golden; Timothy A Turvey; George Blakey; Vincent Kopp; Ceib Phillips; Jay Anderson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Common postoperative complications after general anesthesia in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Parveen Akhter Lone; Nisar Ahmed Wani; Qurrat Ul Ain; Abha Heer; Ranjna Devi; Shivani Mahajan
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-15

Review 3.  Hypotensive anesthesia versus normotensive anesthesia during major maxillofacial surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michal Barak; Leiser Yoav; Imad Abu el-Naaj
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-23

4.  Postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia for oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Benjamas Apipan; Duangdee Rummasak; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-12-31

5.  Influence of propofol intravenous anesthesia on hemorheology, haemodynamics and immune function of colorectal carcinoma patients undergoing radical resection.

Authors:  Jianmin Yu; Mingfen Han; Jun Geng
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.088

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.