| Literature DB >> 22627164 |
Maria M Usowicz1, Claire L P Garden.
Abstract
Down syndrome (DS) is characterized by intellectual disability and impaired motor control. Lack of coordinated movement, poor balance, and unclear speech imply dysfunction of the cerebellum, which is known to be reduced in volume in DS. The principal cause of the smaller cerebellum is a diminished number of granule cells (GCs). These neurons form the 'input layer' of the cerebellar cortex, where sensorimotor information carried by incoming mossy fibers is transformed before it is conveyed to Purkinje cells and inhibitory interneurons. However, it is not known how processing of this information is affected in the hypogranular cerebellum that characterizes DS. Here we explore the possibility that the electrical properties of the surviving GCs are changed. We find that in the Ts65Dn mouse model of DS, GCs have a higher input resistance at voltages approaching the threshold for firing, which causes them to be more excitable. In addition, they fire narrower and larger amplitude action potentials. These subtly modified electrical properties may result in atypical transfer of information at the input layer of the cerebellum.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22627164 PMCID: PMC3389345 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Res ISSN: 0006-8993 Impact factor: 3.252
Fig. 1Intrinsic membrane properties of GCs are altered in Ts65Dn mice. A. Superimposed traces of changes in membrane potential of a mature wild-type (WT) cell (P50, filled circle) and a mature Ts65Dn cell (P53, empty circle) in response to constant current injections (once every 5 s, from − 10 pA in + 2 pA steps). Currents normalized by input capacitance are also given. B. Subthreshold voltage–current relationships for wild-type (n = 35–26) and Ts65Dn (n = 18–16) cells. The relationships differ at current injections above + 8 pA (*f1,32 = 4.21, p = 0.048, two-way repeated measures ANOVA). Solid lines are fitted sigmoidal curves. C. Plots of mean input resistance against membrane potential, obtained by differentiating sigmoidal curves in B. D. Relationships between subthreshold membrane potential and injected current-density. They differ above + 1 pA/pF (*f1,41 = 10.11, p = 0.003, two-way repeated measures ANOVA). Solid lines are fitted sigmoidal curves. E. Plots of mean capacitance-specific membrane resistance against membrane potential (first derivative of sigmoidal curves in D). F. Scatter plots and box plots comparing rheobase (the minimum current-density required to evoke APs) in Ts65Dn and wild-type GCs (median values: WT, 5.1 pA/pF, n = 37; Ts65Dn, 3.8 pA/pF, n = 20; *p = 0.007, Mann–Whitney U test). G. Scatter plots showing no difference in AP voltage-threshold (horizontal lines indicate mean values: WT, − 47.8 mV, n = 37; Ts65Dn, − 47.8 mV, n = 20; p = 0.972, Student's t test). Dashed lines in B–E indicate mean resting membrane potentials.
Fig. 2Enhanced excitability of GCs in Ts65Dn mice is not accompanied by a change in AP accommodation. A. Responses of a wild-type (WT, filled circle) and a Ts65Dn (empty circle) cell to increasing positive current injection, expressed as current-density. B. Dependence of AP frequency on magnitude of injected current-density above rheobase, in wild-type (n = 30–13) and Ts65Dn (n = 15–6) cells. C. Superimposed plots of AP amplitude relative to the first AP during current injections that evoked a minimum of 4, 22 and 46 APs (WT: n = 30, 30, and 25 cells; Ts65Dn: n = 20, 17 and 14 cells). D. Superimposed plots of instantaneous frequency for APs depicted in C.
Fig. 3APs are larger and faster in GCs of Ts65Dn mice. A. Superimposed average APs from wild-type (WT, n = 33) and Ts65Dn (n = 20) cells, aligned on their threshold. B. Plot showing a higher mean overshoot in Ts65Dn cells (*p = 0.031, Student's t test) but no difference in mean afterhyperpolarization (AHP) (*p = 0.933, Student's t test). C. Plots of the maximum rate of fall against maximum rate of rise for APs evoked near the rheobase of individual cells. The slopes of the linear regressions (superimposed solid lines) for the two types of cells were less than − 1 (WT, − 0.79; Ts65Dn, − 0.78). The dashed line has a slope of − 1 and depicts the relationship if the rates of fall and rise during an AP are identical. D. Plots showing that the mean maximum rates of rise (upper) and fall (lower) are faster in Ts65Dn cells (rise: *p = 0.017, Student's t test; fall: *p = 0.048, Student's t test).