Literature DB >> 22627118

Shifting trends in bacterial keratitis in Toronto: an 11-year review.

Alejandro Lichtinger1, Sonia N Yeung, Peter Kim, Maoz D Amiran, Alfonso Iovieno, Uri Elbaz, Judy Y F Ku, Rachel Wolff, David S Rootman, Allan R Slomovic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the distribution, current trends, and resistance patterns of bacterial keratitis isolates in Toronto over the last 11 years.
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, case series. PARTICIPANTS: Microbiology records of suspected bacterial keratitis cases that underwent a diagnostic corneal scraping and cultures from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2010, were reviewed.
METHODS: Culture results and antibiotic sensitivity profiles were reviewed and analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distribution of the main isolated pathogens as well as in vitro laboratory minimum inhibitory concentration testing results to identify resistance patterns.
RESULTS: A total of 1701 consecutive corneal scrapings were taken during the 11 years of the study. A pathogen was recovered in 977 samples (57.4%), with bacterial keratitis accounting for 897 of the positive cultures (91.8%). The total number of Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates was 684 and 213, respectively. We identified a decreasing trend in Gram-positive isolates (P = 0.016). The most common isolate overall was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) and the most common Gram-negative bacteria isolated was Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was present in 1.3% of the S aureus isolates, whereas methicillin-resistant CNS (MRCNS) was present in 43.1% of the CNS isolates. There was a trend toward increasing laboratory resistance to methicillin from 28% during the first 4 years of the study to 38.8% for the last 3 years (P = 0.133). When analyzing the sensitivities of MRSA and MRCNS isolates to other antibiotics, there was resistance to cefazolin and sensitivity to vancomycin in all isolates, whereas resistance to other antibiotics was variable.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant decrease in the percentage of Gram-positive microorganisms over time. The sensitivity of Gram-negative isolates to tested antimicrobials was >97% response for all the reported antibiotics; this was not the case for Gram-positive isolates, in which resistance to the antibiotics was more common. Methicillin-resistant organisms accounted for 29.1% of all Gram-positive cultures in our series, suggesting that the empiric use of vancomycin in the setting of severe suspected bacterial keratitis may be justified.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22627118     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  46 in total

1.  The importance of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system in epithelium traversal depends upon conditions of host susceptibility.

Authors:  Aaron B Sullivan; K P Connie Tam; Matteo M E Metruccio; David J Evans; Suzanne M J Fleiszig
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory findings of infectious keratitis at Mansoura Ophthalmic Center, Egypt.

Authors:  Amani E Badawi; Dalia Moemen; Nora L El-Tantawy
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: Global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Lawson Ung; Paulo J M Bispo; Swapna S Shanbhag; Michael S Gilmore; James Chodosh
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 4.  Antibiotic Resistance in the Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Keratitis: a 20-Year Review.

Authors:  Victoria S Chang; Deepinder K Dhaliwal; Leela Raju; Regis P Kowalski
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Corneal biopsy for diagnosis of recalcitrant microbial keratitis.

Authors:  Dana Robaei; U-Teng Chan; Pauline Khoo; Svetlana Cherepanoff; Yi-Chiao Li; Jane Hanrahan; Stephanie Watson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Moxifloxacin susceptibility mediates the relationship between causative organism and clinical outcome in bacterial keratitis.

Authors:  Catherine E Oldenburg; Prajna Lalitha; Muthiah Srinivasan; Palanisamy Manikandan; M Jayahar Bharathi; Revathi Rajaraman; Meenakshi Ravindran; Jeena Mascarenhas; Natalie Nardone; Kathryn J Ray; David V Glidden; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Characterization of ocular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates belonging predominantly to clonal complex 2 subcluster II.

Authors:  Paulo J M Bispo; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Antonio C C Pignatari
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Use of adjunctive topical corticosteroids in bacterial keratitis.

Authors:  Nina Ni; Muthiah Srinivasan; Stephen D McLeod; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Influence of lipopolysaccharide on proinflammatory gene expression in human corneal, conjunctival and meibomian gland epithelial cells.

Authors:  Di Chen; Afsun Sahin; Wendy R Kam; Yang Liu; Raheleh Rahimi Darabad; David A Sullivan
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Why does the healthy cornea resist Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection?

Authors:  David J Evans; Suzanne M J Fleiszig
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.