| Literature DB >> 22626575 |
Tristan Keys1, Lysanne Campeau, Gopal Badlani.
Abstract
In light of the recent Food and Drug Administration public health notification regarding complications associated with transvaginally placed mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair, we review recent literature to evaluate current outcomes and complication data, analyze the clinical need for mesh on the basis of genetic and biochemical etiologies of POP, and investigate trends of mesh use via an American Urological Association member survey. Mesh-based techniques show better anatomic results than traditional repair of anterior POP, but subjective outcomes are equivalent. Further research and Level I evidence are required before mesh-based repair of POP can be standardized. Adequate surgical training and patient selection should decrease complication rates. Published by Elsevier Inc.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22626575 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urology ISSN: 0090-4295 Impact factor: 2.649