Literature DB >> 22626486

Validity and reliability of the rapid assessment for adolescent preventive services adolescent health risk assessment.

Jennifer Salerno1, Vincent D Marshall, Elisa B Picken.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Seventy-five percent of adolescent morbidity and mortality is a result of risky behaviors. The Rapid Assessment for Adolescent Preventive Services (RAAPS) is a 21-question adolescent risk screening tool developed to identify the behaviors contributing most to adolescent morbidity, mortality, and social problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the RAAPS.
METHODS: This study used psychometric methods to establish face-, content-, and criterion-related validity and inter-rater and equivalence reliability. Focus groups with adolescents (n = 21) and health care professionals (n = 7) were facilitated to establish face validity. Adolescent expert review (n = 10) was gathered to establish content validity and reliability. A retrospective chart audit of adolescents (n = 263) who completed both the RAAPS and the Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services risk questionnaire was conducted to assess criterion-related validity and equivalence between paired question responses using Cohen kappa measure, percent agreement, and Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: Face validity was established by consensus of focus group. Adolescent expert content validity index scores ranged from 0.825 to 1.0, and inter-rater content agreement ranged from 0.9 to 1.0. Cohen kappa ranged from 0.44 to 0.99; percent agreement ranged from 0.71 to .99; Fisher exact test resulted in all p > 0.05 establishing criterion-related validity and equivalence.
CONCLUSION: Validity and reliability of the RAAPS as a measure of adolescent risk behaviors was established. Results indicate RAAPS is an acceptable screening tool in identifying adolescent risk behaviors, contributing most to morbidity, mortality, and social problems.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22626486     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  4 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial assessments for young people: a systematic review examining acceptability, disclosure and engagement, and predictive utility.

Authors:  Sally Bradford; Debra Rickwood
Journal:  Adolesc Health Med Ther       Date:  2012-12-21

2.  Improving Patient-Centered Care for Young People in General Practice With a Codesigned Screening App: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Marianne Julie Webb; Greg Wadley; Lena Amanda Sanci
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Association of Youth Characteristics and Recent Utilization of Dental Services in the United States.

Authors:  Ilana R A Chertok; Nathaniel Chertok; Zelalem T Haile; Bhakti Chavan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Minor physical anomalies in adolescents at risk for substance use and early sex.

Authors:  Meng-Che Tsai; Chih-Ting Lee; I-Ning Tsai; Shu-Ting Gan; Yi-Lin Liang; Sheng-Hsiang Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.