Literature DB >> 22626056

Theoretical foundations of a Starling-like controller for rotary blood pumps.

Robert Francis Salamonsen1, Einly Lim, Nicholas Gaddum, Abdul-Hakeem H AlOmari, Shaun David Gregory, Michael Stevens, David Glen Mason, John F Fraser, Daniel Timms, Mohan K Karunanithi, Nigel Hamilton Lovell.   

Abstract

A clinically intuitive physiologic controller is desired to improve the interaction between implantable rotary blood pumps and the cardiovascular system. This controller should restore the Starling mechanism of the heart, thus preventing overpumping and underpumping scenarios plaguing their implementation. A linear Starling-like controller for pump flow which emulated the response of the natural left ventricle (LV) to changes in preload was then derived using pump flow pulsatility as the feedback variable. The controller could also adapt the control line gradient to accommodate longer-term changes in cardiovascular parameters, most importantly LV contractility which caused flow pulsatility to move outside predefined limits. To justify the choice of flow pulsatility, four different pulsatility measures (pump flow, speed, current, and pump head pressure) were investigated as possible surrogates for LV stroke work. Simulations using a validated numerical model were used to examine the relationships between LV stroke work and these measures. All were approximately linear (r(2) (mean ± SD) = 0.989 ± 0.013, n = 30) between the limits of ventricular suction and opening of the aortic valve. After aortic valve opening, the four measures differed greatly in sensitivity to further increases in LV stroke work. Pump flow pulsatility showed more correspondence with changes in LV stroke work before and after opening of the aortic valve and was least affected by changes in the LV and right ventricular (RV) contractility, blood volume, peripheral vascular resistance, and heart rate. The system (flow pulsatility) response to primary changes in pump flow was then demonstrated to be appropriate for stable control of the circulation. As medical practitioners have an instinctive understanding of the Starling curve, which is central to the synchronization of LV and RV outputs, the intuitiveness of the proposed Starling-like controller will promote acceptance and enable rational integration into patterns of hemodynamic management.
© 2012, Copyright the Authors. Artificial Organs © 2012, International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22626056     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2012.01457.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  10 in total

1.  Preload Sensitivity with TORVAD Counterpulse Support Prevents Suction and Overpumping.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Gohean; Erik R Larson; Raul G Longoria; Mark Kurusz; Richard W Smalling
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.495

2.  In Vivo Evaluation of a Physiologic Control System for Rotary Blood Pumps Based on the Left Ventricular Pressure-Volume Loop.

Authors:  Joshua Cysyk; Choon-Sik Jhun; Ray Newswanger; Walter Pae; Jenelle Izer; Heidi Flory; John Reibson; William Weiss; Gerson Rosenberg
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2022-12-01       Impact factor: 3.826

3.  Preload-based starling-like control for rotary blood pumps: numerical comparison with pulsatility control and constant speed operation.

Authors:  Mahdi Mansouri; Robert F Salamonsen; Einly Lim; Rini Akmeliawati; Nigel H Lovell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for Advanced Heart Failure: Are We about to Witness a New "Gold Standard"?

Authors:  Massimo Capoccia
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2016-12-12

5.  Preload-based Starling-like control of rotary blood pumps: An in-vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Mahdi Mansouri; Shaun D Gregory; Robert F Salamonsen; Nigel H Lovell; Michael C Stevens; Jo P Pauls; Rini Akmeliawati; Einly Lim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Exercise gas exchange in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients.

Authors:  Alessandro Mezzani; Massimo Pistono; Piergiuseppe Agostoni; Andrea Giordano; Marco Gnemmi; Alessandro Imparato; Pierluigi Temporelli; Ugo Corrà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An Intra-Cycle Optimal Control Framework for Ventricular Assist Devices Based on Atrioventricular Plane Displacement Modeling.

Authors:  Clemens Zeile; Thomas Rauwolf; Alexander Schmeisser; Jeremi Kaj Mizerski; Rüdiger C Braun-Dullaeus; Sebastian Sager
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Hemodynamic exercise responses with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Comparison of patients' response and cardiorespiratory simulations.

Authors:  Christoph Gross; Libera Fresiello; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Kamen Dimitrov; Christiane Marko; Martin Maw; Bart Meyns; Dominik Wiedemann; Daniel Zimpfer; Heinrich Schima; Francesco Moscato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of an advanced model reference sliding mode control method for cardiac assist device using a numerical model.

Authors:  Mohsen Bakouri
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.615

10.  Control Strategy Design of a Microblood Pump Based on Heart-Rate Feedback.

Authors:  Teng Jing; Tianye Xin; Fangqun Wang; Zhihao Zhang; Ling Zhou
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.891

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.