Literature DB >> 22624646

An evaluation framework for non-medical prescribing research.

Andrew R Hale1, Danielle A Stowasser, Ian D Coombes, Julie Stokes, Lisa Nissen.   

Abstract

Without robust and credible evidence for the benefits in health outcomes of non-medical prescribing, widespread implementation will be challenging. Our aim is to develop a consistent evaluation framework that could be applied to non-medical prescribing research. An informal collaboration was initiated in 2008 by a group of pharmacists from Australia and New Zealand to assist in information sharing, pilot design, methodologies and evaluation for pharmacist prescribing. Different pilots used different models, methodologies and evaluation. It was agreed that the development of a consistent evaluation framework to be applied to future research on non-medical prescribing was required. The framework would help to align the outcomes of different research pilots and enable the comparison of endpoints to determine the effectiveness of a non-medical prescribing intervention.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22624646     DOI: 10.1071/AH10986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  2 in total

1.  Survey of patients' experiences and perceptions of care provided by nurse and pharmacist independent prescribers in primary care.

Authors:  Michela Tinelli; Alison Blenkinsopp; Sue Latter; Alesha Smith; Stephen R Chapman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Using scenarios to test the appropriateness of pharmacist prescribing in asthma management.

Authors:  Tamer Hanna; Beata Bajorek; Kate Lemay; Carol L Armour
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2014-03-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.