Literature DB >> 22624605

When less is more: evidence for a facilitative cathodal tDCS effect in attentional abilities.

Michal Weiss1, Michal Lavidor.   

Abstract

Many previous studies reported that the hyperpolarization of cortical neurons following cathodal stimulation (in transcranial direct current stimulation) has resulted in cognitive performance degradation. Here, we challenge this assumption by showing that cathodal stimulation will not always degrade cognitive performance. We used an attentional load paradigm in which irrelevant stimuli are processed only under low but not under high attentional load. Thirty healthy participants were randomly allocated into three interventional groups with different brain stimulation parameters (active anodal posterior parietal cortex [PPC], active cathodal PPC, and sham). Cathodal but not anodal stimulation enabled flanker processing even in high-loaded scenes. A second experiment was carried out to assert whether the improved flanker processing under cathodal stimulation is because of altered attention allocation between center and surround or, alternatively, enhanced attentional resources. In this experiment, the flanker was presented centrally. The results of Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1's finding of improved flanker processing. We interpret the results from these two experiments as evidence for the ability of cathodal stimulation to enhance attentional resources rather than simply change attention allocation between center and periphery. Cathodal stimulation in high-loaded scenes can act like a noise filter and may in fact enhance cognitive performance. This study contributes to understanding the way the PPC is engaged with attentional functions and explains the cathodal effects, which thus might lead to more efficient brain stimulation protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22624605     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  28 in total

1.  Frontotemporal stimulation modulates semantically-guided visual search during confrontation naming: A combined tDCS and eye tracking investigation.

Authors:  Richard J Binney; Sameer A Ashaie; Bonnie M Zuckerman; Jinyi Hung; Jamie Reilly
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Modulation of top-down control of visual attention by cathodal tDCS over right IPS.

Authors:  Katharina Moos; Simone Vossel; Ralph Weidner; Roland Sparing; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation influences bilingual language control mechanism: evidence from cross-frequency coupling.

Authors:  Jing Tong; Chao Kong; Xin Wang; Huanhuan Liu; Baike Li; Yuying He
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 4.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Cathodal tDCS of the bilateral anterior temporal lobes facilitates semantically-driven verbal fluency.

Authors:  Richard J Binney; Bonnie M Zuckerman; Hilary N Waller; Jinyi Hung; Sameer A Ashaie; Jamie Reilly
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Differential frontal involvement in shifts of internal and perceptual attention.

Authors:  Ryan T Tanoue; Kevin T Jones; Dwight J Peterson; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Oscar Ferrante; Francesco Marini; Elisa Santandrea; Luigi Cattaneo; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Shaping memory accuracy by left prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bastian Zwissler; Christoph Sperber; Sina Aigeldinger; Sebastian Schindler; Johanna Kissler; Christian Plewnia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Parietal contributions to visual working memory depend on task difficulty.

Authors:  Kevin T Jones; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex modulates decision-making and executive control.

Authors:  Giulia Mattavelli; Sara Lo Presti; Diana Tornaghi; Nicola Canessa
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.748

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.