Literature DB >> 22624220

Despotic, high-impact species and the subcontinental scale control of avian assemblage structure.

Ralph MacNally1, Michiala Bowen, Alison Howes, Clive A McAlpine, Martine Maron.   

Abstract

Some species have disproportionate influence on assemblage structure, given their numbers or biomass. Most examples of such "strong interactors" come from small-scale experiments or from observations of the effects of invasive species. There is evidence that entire avian assemblages in open woodlands can be influenced strongly by individual species over very large areas in eastern Australia, with small-bodied species (< 50 g) being adversely affected. We used data from repeated surveys in 371 sites in seven districts across a region from Victoria to Queensland (> 2000 km). A series of linked Bayesian models was used to identify large-bodied (> or = 50 g) bird species that were associated with changes in occurrence and abundance of small-bodied species. One native species, the Noisy Miner (Manorina melanocephala; family Meliphagidae), was objectively identified as the sole large-bodied species having similar detrimental effects in all districts, depressing occurrence of 57 of 71 small-bodied species. Adverse effects on abundances of small-bodied species were profound when the Noisy Miner occurred with mean site abundances > or = 1.6 birds/2 ha. The Noisy Miner may be the first species to have been shown to influence whole-of-avifauna assemblage structure through despotic aggressiveness over subcontinental scales. These substantial shifts in occurrence rates and abundances of small-bodied species flow on to alter species abundance distributions of entire assemblages over much of eastern Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22624220     DOI: 10.1890/10-2340.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  8 in total

1.  Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions?

Authors:  Jian D L Yen; James R Thomson; Ralph Mac Nally
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Competition and hybridization drive interspecific territoriality in birds.

Authors:  Jonathan P Drury; Madeline C Cowen; Gregory F Grether
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The control of rank-abundance distributions by a competitive despotic species.

Authors:  Ralph Mac Nally; Clive A McAlpine; Hugh P Possingham; Martine Maron
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Visualization of species pairwise associations: a case study of surrogacy in bird assemblages.

Authors:  Peter W Lane; David B Lindenmayer; Philip S Barton; Wade Blanchard; Martin J Westgate
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Short-term response of a declining woodland bird assemblage to the removal of a despotic competitor.

Authors:  Galen Davitt; Kimberly Maute; Richard E Major; Paul G McDonald; Martine Maron
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Mistletoes could moderate drought impacts on birds, but are themselves susceptible to drought-induced dieback.

Authors:  Ross Crates; David M Watson; Gregory F Albery; Timothée Bonnet; Liam Murphy; Laura Rayner; Dejan Stojanovic; Chris Timewell; Beau Meney; Mick Roderick; Dean Ingwersen; Robert Heinsohn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Influence of interspecific competition and landscape structure on spatial homogenization of avian assemblages.

Authors:  Oliver J Robertson; Clive McAlpine; Alan House; Martine Maron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  At the Crossroads: Does the Configuration of Roadside Vegetation Affect Woodland Bird Communities in Rural Landscapes?

Authors:  Mark Hall; Dale Nimmo; Andrew F Bennett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.