| Literature DB >> 22624091 |
Douglas J McCauley1, Paul A Desalles, Hillary S Young, Robert B Dunbar, Rodolfo Dirzo, Matthew M Mills, Fiorenza Micheli.
Abstract
Human impact on biodiversity usually is measured by reduction in species abundance or richness. Just as important, but much more difficult to discern, is the anthropogenic elimination of ecological interactions. Here we report on the persistence of a long ecological interaction chain linking diverse food webs and habitats in the near-pristine portions of a remote Pacific atoll. Using biogeochemical assays, animal tracking, and field surveys we show that seabirds roosting on native trees fertilize soils, increasing coastal nutrients and the abundance of plankton, thus attracting manta rays to native forest coastlines. Partnered observations conducted in regions of this atoll where native trees have been replaced by human propagated palms reveal that this complex interaction chain linking trees to mantas readily breaks down. Taken together these findings provide a compelling example of how anthropogenic disturbance may be contributing to widespread reductions in ecological interaction chain length, thereby isolating and simplifying ecosystems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22624091 PMCID: PMC3354671 DOI: 10.1038/srep00409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Description of a long interaction chain linking forests to manta rays.
This chain is retained in less disturbed native forest but its integrity is compromised in human-altered palm forest. Bar graphs comparing processes in native (N) and palm (P) forests (mean ± SE) indicate that reductions in native tree abundance (A) reduce seabird abundance (B), which diminish the contribution of seabird derived nutrient subsidies to terrestrial ecosystems (C,D), which severely impair the movement of nutrients to the marine environment (E), reducing zooplankton abundance (F), and ultimately eliminating manta ray (Manta birostris) utilization of native forest coastlines (G). Delta values depict the difference between mean δ15N of native forest and palm forest material (Δδ15N = δ15NN − δ15NP). Positive delta values measured at multiple points along this lengthy interaction chain reveal that taxa in native forest zones are causally linked to one another via dependency upon isotopically elevated seabird derived nutrients.
Comparisons of processes in less disturbed native forests to those in more altered palm forests. Paired comparisons (pooled and analyzed by date) were made for all responses that were sampled repeatedly over time *. Na represents the total number of measurements conducted. Nb (unpaired comparisons only) represents the number of replicates included in all statistical analyses after measurements were pooled at the level of transect for analysis. Nc (paired comparisons only) represents the number of temporal comparisons included in analyses where repeated sampling was conducted over time. Parametric or nonparametric (†) test statistics are reported for each comparison. Data collection was distributed equally between native and palm forests
| Native forests | Palm forests | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (± SE) | Mean (± SE) | ||||||
| % cover native trees | 83.6 (± 2.0) | 20.5 (± 9.6) | 10.6 (8) | <0.0001 | 10 | 10 | - |
| Bird biomass (g m−1 coastline) | 515.7 (± 60.2) | 107.1 (± 22.8) | 9.5 (8) | <0.0001 | 46 | 10 | - |
| Soil nitrogen (NO3− and NH4+; μg/g) | 201.5 (± 63.0) | 39.7 (± 10.5) | 3.6 (23) | <0.001 | 25 | 25 | - |
| % foliar nitrogen | 3.7 (± 0.2) | 2.5 (± 0.4) | 3.0 (12) | 0.01 | 14 | 14 | - |
| Runoff water nitrogen (NO3−; ppm) * | 0.18 (± 0.1) | 0.01 (± 0.001) | 4.1 (7) | <0.01 | 51 | - | 8 |
| % change in Chl | 372.5 (± 96.3) | 291.9 (± 102.1) | 5.0 (4) | <0.01 | 47 | - | 5 |
| Zooplankton biomass (g m−3) * | 0.13 (± 0.04) | 0.04 (± 0.01) | 4.0 (7) | <0.01 | 77 | - | 8 |
| Copepod length (mm) * | 1.03 (± 0.03) | 0.97 (± 0.03) | 2.2 (8) | 0.06 | 4,970 | 9 | |
| No. individual mantas (survey min−1) *† | 0.07 (± 0.02) | 0 (± 0) | 105 | <0.01 | 196 | - | 21 |
Comparisons of the δ15N of materials associated with native and palm forests. Differences in zooplankton δ15N were evaluated using paired comparisons (pooled by date; indicated with *) owing to their rapid turnover. All other parameters were compared using unpaired tests. Na represents the total number of measurements conducted. Nb (zooplankton only) denotes the number of temporal comparisons conducted. Sampling was evenly split between native and palm forest sites
| Native forests Mean (± SE) | Palm forests Mean (± SE) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soils | 16.6 (± 0.9) | 10.4 (± 1.1) | 4.4 (16) | <0.001 | 18 |
| Tree leaves ( | 15.4 (± 1.3) | 8.3 (± 2.3) | 2.6 (12) | 0.01 | 14 |
| Intertidal clams ( | 11.0 (± 0.9) | 5.9 (± 0.6) | 4.6 (11) | 0.01 | 13 |
| Subtidal sponges ( | 11.0 (± 0.1) | 10.4 (± 0.2) | 2.4 (31) | 0.02 | 46 |
| Zooplankton* | 11.3 (± 0.2) | 10.9 (± 0.2) | 3.0 (5) | 0.03 | 46; 6 |