Literature DB >> 22623647

A transcriptomics-based in vitro assay for predicting chemical genotoxicity in vivo.

C Magkoufopoulou1, S M H Claessen, M Tsamou, D G J Jennen, J C S Kleinjans, J H M van Delft.   

Abstract

The lack of accurate in vitro assays for predicting in vivo toxicity of chemicals together with new legislations demanding replacement and reduction of animal testing has triggered the development of alternative methods. This study aimed at developing a transcriptomics-based in vitro prediction assay for in vivo genotoxicity. Transcriptomics changes induced in the human liver cell line HepG2 by 34 compounds after treatment for 12, 24, and 48 h were used for the selection of gene-sets that are capable of discriminating between in vivo genotoxins (GTX) and in vivo nongenotoxins (NGTX). By combining transcriptomics with publicly available results for these chemicals from standard in vitro genotoxicity studies, we developed several prediction models. These models were validated by using an additional set of 28 chemicals. The best prediction was achieved after stratification of chemicals according to results from the Ames bacterial gene mutation assay prior to transcriptomics evaluation after 24h of treatment. A total of 33 genes were selected for discriminating GTX from NGTX for Ames-positive chemicals and 22 for Ames-negative chemicals. Overall, this method resulted in 89% accuracy and 91% specificity, thereby clearly outperforming the standard in vitro test battery. Transcription factor network analysis revealed HNF3a, HNF4a, HNF6, androgen receptor, and SP1 as main factors regulating the expression of classifiers for Ames-positive chemicals. Thus, the classical bacterial gene mutation assay in combination with in vitro transcriptomics in HepG2 is proposed as an upgraded in vitro approach for predicting in vivo genotoxicity of chemicals holding a great promise for reducing animal experimentations on genotoxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22623647     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgs182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  18 in total

Review 1.  Boolean network modeling in systems pharmacology.

Authors:  Peter Bloomingdale; Van Anh Nguyen; Jin Niu; Donald E Mager
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  TREAP: A New Topological Approach to Drug Target Inference.

Authors:  Muying Wang; Lauren L Luciani; Heeju Noh; Ericka Mochan; Jason E Shoemaker
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  In vivo assessment of respiratory burst inhibition by xenobiotic exposure using larval zebrafish.

Authors:  Drake W Phelps; Ashley A Fletcher; Ivan Rodriguez-Nunez; Michele R Balik-Meisner; Debra A Tokarz; David M Reif; Dori R Germolec; Jeffrey A Yoder
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Network perturbation analysis of gene transcriptional profiles reveals protein targets and mechanism of action of drugs and influenza A viral infection.

Authors:  Heeju Noh; Jason E Shoemaker; Rudiyanto Gunawan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Prediction of developmental chemical toxicity based on gene networks of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Junko Yamane; Sachiyo Aburatani; Satoshi Imanishi; Hiromi Akanuma; Reiko Nagano; Tsuyoshi Kato; Hideko Sone; Seiichiroh Ohsako; Wataru Fujibuchi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  High-throughput data integration of RNA-miRNA-circRNA reveals novel insights into mechanisms of benzo[a]pyrene-induced carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Florian Caiment; Stan Gaj; Sandra Claessen; Jos Kleinjans
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells.

Authors:  Julie K Buick; Ivy Moffat; Andrew Williams; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Daniel R Hyduke; Heng-Hong Li; Albert J Fornace; Jiri Aubrecht; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  A metabolomics investigation of non-genotoxic carcinogenicity in the rat.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Ament; Claire L Waterman; James A West; Catherine Waterfield; Richard A Currie; Jayne Wright; Julian L Griffin
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Testing chemical carcinogenicity by using a transcriptomics HepaRG-based model?

Authors:  T Y Doktorova; Reha Yildirimman; Liesbeth Ceelen; Mireia Vilardell; Tamara Vanhaecke; Mathieu Vinken; Gamze Ates; Anja Heymans; Hans Gmuender; Roque Bort; Raffaella Corvi; Pascal Phrakonkham; Ruoya Li; Nicolas Mouchet; Christophe Chesne; Joost van Delft; Jos Kleinjans; Jose Castell; Ralf Herwig; Vera Rogiers
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.068

10.  Investigating the different mechanisms of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens by a gene set analysis.

Authors:  Won Jun Lee; Sang Cheol Kim; Seul Ji Lee; Jeongmi Lee; Jeong Hill Park; Kyung-Sang Yu; Johan Lim; Sung Won Kwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.