Literature DB >> 22623552

Differentiation of kidney stones using dual-energy CT with and without a tin filter.

George S K Fung1, Satomi Kawamoto, Brian R Matlaga, Katsuyuki Taguchi, Xiaodong Zhou, Elliot K Fishman, Benjamin M W Tsui.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to examine the capability of three protocols of dual-energy CT imaging in distinguishing calcium oxalate, calcium phosphate, and uric acid kidney stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 calcium oxalate, calcium phosphate, and uric acid human kidney stone samples were placed in individual containers inside a cylindric water phantom and imaged with a dual-energy CT scanner using the following three scanning protocols of different combinations of tube voltage, with and without a tin filter: 80 and 140 kVp without a tin filter, 100 and 140 kVp with a tin filter, and 80 and 140 kVp with a tin filter. The mean attenuation value (in Hounsfield units) of each stone was recorded in both low- and high-energy CT images in each protocol. The dual-energy ratio of the mean attenuation values of each stone was computed for each protocol.
RESULTS: For all three protocols, the uric acid stones were significantly different (p < 0.001) from the calciferous stones according to their dual-energy ratio values. For differentiating calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate stones, the difference between their dual-energy ratio values was statistically significant, with different degrees of significance (range, p < 0.001 to p = 0.03) for all three protocols. On the basis of the values of the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of calcified stone differentiation, the three protocols were ranked in the following order: the 80- and 140-kVp tin filter protocol (AUC, 0.996), the 100- and 140-kVp tin filter protocol (AUC, 0.918), and the 80- and 140-kVp protocol (AUC, 0.871).
CONCLUSION: The tin filter added to the high-energy tube and the use of a wider dual-energy difference are important for improving the stone differentiation capability of dual-energy CT imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22623552     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of low-dose dual energy computed tomography for in vivo assessment of renal/ureteric calculus composition.

Authors:  Harshavardhan Mahalingam; Anupam Lal; Arup K Mandal; Shrawan Kumar Singh; Shalmoli Bhattacharyya; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-08-10

2.  [Imaging for diagnostics of urolithiasis including dual-energy CT].

Authors:  F Strittmatter; C Gratzke; A Graser; C G Stief; T R C Johnson
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Visualization of joint and bone using dual-energy CT arthrography with contrast subtraction: in vitro feasibility study using porcine joints.

Authors:  Jee Won Chai; Jung-Ah Choi; Ja-Young Choi; Sujin Kim; Sung Hwan Hong; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Evaluation of dual energy quantitative CT for determining the spatial distributions of red marrow and bone for dosimetry in internal emitter radiation therapy.

Authors:  Mitchell M Goodsitt; Apeksha Shenoy; Jincheng Shen; David Howard; Matthew J Schipper; Scott Wilderman; Emmanuel Christodoulou; Se Young Chun; Yuni K Dewaraja
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Predicting stone composition before treatment - can it really drive clinical decisions?

Authors:  Ewa Bres-Niewada; Bartosz Dybowski; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-12-05

6.  In vitro analysis of urinary stone composition in dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Monika Stępień; Robert Chrzan; Wojciech Gawlas
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-10

7.  K-edge Subtraction Computed Tomography with a Compact Synchrotron X-ray Source.

Authors:  Stephanie Kulpe; Martin Dierolf; Benedikt Günther; Madleen Busse; Klaus Achterhold; Bernhard Gleich; Julia Herzen; Ernst Rummeny; Franz Pfeiffer; Daniela Pfeiffer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.