Literature DB >> 2262355

Concomitant boost radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of carcinoma of the oropharynx and nasopharynx.

K K Ang1, L J Peters, R S Weber, M H Maor, W H Morrison, C D Wendt, B W Brown.   

Abstract

Concomitant boost schedules are characterized by delivering the boost (10-12 fractions) as second daily treatments during rather than following the basic wide field irradiations. This results in shortening the overall time to administer 69-72 Gy from 7 1/2-8 weeks to 6 weeks, which we hoped would improve the tumor control rate by reducing the opportunity for tumor clonogens to regenerate during treatment. From August 1985 to August 1988, 79 patients with T2-4 carcinomas of the oropharynx (72 patients) or nasopharynx (7 patients) were treated according to 1 of the 3 variants of the concomitant boost technique. The median age of patients was 60 years (range: 19-84 years) and the male-to-female ratio was 2.6. The overall 2-year actuarial primary and nodal control rates by radiotherapy alone were 74% and 76%, respectively. The ultimate 2-year control rates after surgical salvage were 82% and 84%, respectively. If the boost given during the last 2-2 1/2 weeks of basic treatment, a slightly better primary control rate (p = 0.11) resulted than if the boost was delivered during the first 2-2 1/2 weeks or twice a week throughout the basic treatment. The 2-year actuarial primary control rate of the 13 patients receiving induction chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy was significantly lower than that of patients treated with radiation only (81% vs 34%, p = 0.01), but this could be partly attributed to a more advanced stage in the chemotherapy group. The acute mucosal reactions were, as expected, more severe than those observed with conventional fractionation. Fifty patients developed confluent mucositis covering more than half of the boost area. Such reactions lasted for more than 6 weeks in seven patients. Late complications, however, so far observed, have been few. Three patients experienced chronic mucosal tenderness, 1 chronic mucosal ulceration, 2 transient bone exposure, and 1 carotid rupture following salvage surgery. The results so far appear to be better than the outcome of conventional radiotherapy. Its real value will be determined in a prospective randomized study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2262355     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90341-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

Review 1.  Altered fractionation in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  K S Hu; L B Harrison
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Randomized phase III trial to test accelerated versus standard fractionation in combination with concurrent cisplatin for head and neck carcinomas in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0129 trial: long-term report of efficacy and toxicity.

Authors:  Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan; Qiang Zhang; K Kian Ang; Randal S Weber; David I Rosenthal; Denis Soulieres; Harold Kim; Craig Silverman; Adam Raben; Thomas J Galloway; André Fortin; Elizabeth Gore; William H Westra; Christine H Chung; Richard C Jordan; Maura L Gillison; Marcie List; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Management of cervical metastasis.

Authors:  Eric J Lentsch
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Altered and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in locoregional control and survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx.

Authors:  Valentina Krstevska; Simonida Crvenkova
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Final results of a phase II single-institutional trial with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX) and four-weekly continuous cisplatin in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  F Arias; G Asín; M I Uzcanga; E Maraví; I Quílez; V Chicata; C Eito; A Viudez; I Hernández; F Mañeru; M A Domínguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  A prospective investigation of swallowing, nutrition, and patient-rated functional impact following altered fractionation radiotherapy with concomitant boost for oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Bena Cartmill; Petrea Cornwell; Elizabeth Ward; Wendy Davidson; Sandro Porceddu
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Final results of local-regional control and late toxicity of RTOG 9003: a randomized trial of altered fractionation radiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan J Beitler; Qiang Zhang; Karen K Fu; Andy Trotti; Sharon A Spencer; Christopher U Jones; Adam S Garden; George Shenouda; Jonathan Harris; Kian K Ang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Disease-control rates following intensity-modulated radiation therapy for small primary oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Adam S Garden; William H Morrison; Pei-Fong Wong; Sam S Tung; David I Rosenthal; Lei Dong; Brian Mason; George H Perkins; K Kian Ang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Final Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 9003: Provocative, but Limited Conclusions From Exploratory Analyses.

Authors:  David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller; Lester J Peters; Howard D Thames
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Cancer of the head and neck.

Authors:  J S Tobias
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.