Literature DB >> 22623491

Multijoint error compensation mediates unstable object control.

Tyler Cluff1, Aspasia Manos, Timothy D Lee, Ramesh Balasubramaniam.   

Abstract

A key feature of skilled object control is the ability to correct performance errors. This process is not straightforward for unstable objects (e.g., inverted pendulum or "stick" balancing) because the mechanics of the object are sensitive to small control errors, which can lead to rapid performance changes. In this study, we have characterized joint recruitment and coordination processes in an unstable object control task. Our objective was to determine whether skill acquisition involves changes in the recruitment of individual joints or distributed error compensation. To address this problem, we monitored stick-balancing performance across four experimental sessions. We confirmed that subjects learned the task by showing an increase in the stability and length of balancing trials across training sessions. We demonstrated that motor learning led to the development of a multijoint error compensation strategy such that after training, subjects preferentially constrained joint angle variance that jeopardized task performance. The selective constraint of destabilizing joint angle variance was an important metric of motor learning. Finally, we performed a combined uncontrolled manifold-permutation analysis to ensure the variance structure was not confounded by differences in the variance of individual joint angles. We showed that reliance on multijoint error compensation increased, whereas individual joint variation (primarily at the wrist joint) decreased systematically with training. We propose a learning mechanism that is based on the accurate estimation of sensory states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22623491     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00691.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  4 in total

1.  The human motor system alters its reaching movement plan for task-irrelevant, positional forces.

Authors:  Joshua G A Cashaback; Heather R McGregor; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Physical Demand but Not Dexterity Is Associated with Motor Flexibility during Rapid Reaching in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Christian Greve; Tibor Hortobàgyi; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Individual differences in learning a novel discrete motor task.

Authors:  Laura Golenia; Marina M Schoemaker; Leonora J Mouton; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Preparing to move: Setting initial conditions to simplify interactions with complex objects.

Authors:  Rashida Nayeem; Salah Bazzi; Mohsen Sadeghi; Neville Hogan; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.