Literature DB >> 22623217

When emotional valence modulates audiovisual integration.

Mario Maiworm1, Marina Bellantoni, Charles Spence, Brigitte Röder.   

Abstract

We constantly integrate the information that is available to our various senses. The extent to which the mechanisms of multisensory integration are subject to the influences of attention, emotion, and/or motivation is currently unknown. The "ventriloquist effect" is widely assumed to be an automatic crossmodal phenomenon, shifting the perceived location of an auditory stimulus toward a concurrently presented visual stimulus. In the present study, we examined whether audiovisual binding, as indicated by the magnitude of the ventriloquist effect, is influenced by threatening auditory stimuli presented prior to the ventriloquist experiment. Syllables spoken in a fearful voice were presented from one of eight loudspeakers, while syllables spoken in a neutral voice were presented from the other seven locations. Subsequently, participants had to localize pure tones while trying to ignore concurrent visual stimuli (both the auditory and the visual stimuli here were emotionally neutral). A reliable ventriloquist effect was observed. The emotional stimulus manipulation resulted in a reduction of the magnitude of the subsequently measured ventriloquist effect in both hemifields, as compared to a control group exposed to a similar attention-capturing, but nonemotional, manipulation. These results suggest that the emotional system is capable of influencing multisensory binding processes that have heretofore been considered automatic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22623217     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0310-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  12 in total

1.  Spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect revisited.

Authors:  Patrick Bruns; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-28

2.  Short-term visual deprivation reduces interference effects of task-irrelevant facial expressions on affective prosody judgments.

Authors:  Ineke Fengler; Elena Nava; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-22

Review 3.  Assessing the Role of the 'Unity Assumption' on Multisensory Integration: A Review.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  The Ventriloquist Illusion as a Tool to Study Multisensory Processing: An Update.

Authors:  Patrick Bruns
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-12

Review 5.  Double Flash Illusions: Current Findings and Future Directions.

Authors:  Julian Keil
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Cross-Modal Integration of Reward Value during Oculomotor Planning.

Authors:  Felicia Pei-Hsin Cheng; Adem Saglam; Selina André; Arezoo Pooresmaeili
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-02-17

7.  Feedback Modulates Audio-Visual Spatial Recalibration.

Authors:  Alexander Kramer; Brigitte Röder; Patrick Bruns
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-17

Review 8.  Defining Auditory-Visual Objects: Behavioral Tests and Physiological Mechanisms.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Ross K Maddox; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Positive Emotion Facilitates Audiovisual Binding.

Authors:  Miho S Kitamura; Katsumi Watanabe; Norimichi Kitagawa
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-25

10.  Emotional information affects fission illusion induced by audio-visual interactions.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.