Literature DB >> 22623200

Birds achieve high robustness in uneven terrain through active control of landing conditions.

Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery1, Monica A Daley.   

Abstract

We understand little about how animals adjust locomotor behaviour to negotiate uneven terrain. The mechanical demands and constraints of such behaviours likely differ from uniform terrain locomotion. Here we investigated how common pheasants negotiate visible obstacles with heights from 10 to 50% of leg length. Our goal was to determine the neuro-mechanical strategies used to achieve robust stability, and address whether strategies vary with obstacle height. We found that control of landing conditions was crucial for minimising fluctuations in stance leg loading and work in uneven terrain. Variation in touchdown leg angle (θ(TD)) was correlated with the orientation of ground force during stance, and the angle between the leg and body velocity vector at touchdown (β(TD)) was correlated with net limb work. Pheasants actively targeted obstacles to control body velocity and leg posture at touchdown to achieve nearly steady dynamics on the obstacle step. In the approach step to an obstacle, the birds produced net positive limb work to launch themselves upward. On the obstacle, body dynamics were similar to uniform terrain. Pheasants also increased swing leg retraction velocity during obstacle negotiation, which we suggest is an active strategy to minimise fluctuations in peak force and leg posture in uneven terrain. Thus, pheasants appear to achieve robustly stable locomotion through a combination of path planning using visual feedback and active adjustment of leg swing dynamics to control landing conditions. We suggest that strategies for robust stability are context specific, depending on the quality of sensory feedback available, especially visual input.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22623200     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.065557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  15 in total

1.  Trunk orientation causes asymmetries in leg function in small bird terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  Emanuel Andrada; Christian Rode; Yefta Sutedja; John A Nyakatura; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sensory feedback and coordinating asymmetrical landing in toads.

Authors:  S M Cox; Gary B Gillis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Human and avian running on uneven ground: a model-based comparison.

Authors:  R Müller; A V Birn-Jeffery; Y Blum
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Don't break a leg: running birds from quail to ostrich prioritise leg safety and economy on uneven terrain.

Authors:  Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Christian M Hubicki; Yvonne Blum; Daniel Renjewski; Jonathan W Hurst; Monica A Daley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Posture alteration as a measure to accommodate uneven ground in able-bodied gait.

Authors:  Soran Aminiaghdam; Reinhard Blickhan; Roy Muller; Christian Rode
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of altered sagittal trunk orientation on kinetic pattern in able-bodied walking on uneven ground.

Authors:  Soran Aminiaghdam; Christian Rode
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  Swing-leg trajectory of running guinea fowl suggests task-level priority of force regulation rather than disturbance rejection.

Authors:  Yvonne Blum; Hamid R Vejdani; Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Christian M Hubicki; Jonathan W Hurst; Monica A Daley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Geckos decouple fore- and hind limb kinematics in response to changes in incline.

Authors:  Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Timothy E Higham
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  How do treadmill speed and terrain visibility influence neuromuscular control of guinea fowl locomotion?

Authors:  Joanne C Gordon; Jeffery W Rankin; Monica A Daley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Locomotor Behavior of Chickens Anticipating Incline Walking.

Authors:  Chantal LeBlanc; Bret Tobalske; Bill Szkotnicki; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.